Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

81
You were a decent Starcraft 2 commentator, shame you turned out to be a shit man. (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by diogenesOTarch 1 year ago by diogenesOTarch +81 / -0
59 comments share
59 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
▲ 43 ▼
– Galean 43 points 1 year ago +43 / -0

Lets not forget how proud he was about not having prenup. He was so cocky and superior when he was saying it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 40 ▼
– HallucinatoryBeing 40 points 1 year ago +40 / -0

Prenups are worthless. All a whaman has to do is turn up the crocodile tears and cry how she was "coerced" into signing it for a family court judge to throw it out. I have to give a morsel of credit to Destiny for not spending $1000+ on legal toilet paper.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 27 ▼
– TheOutlaw 27 points 1 year ago +27 / -0

Thank you, this can't be said enough. I don't know why people (in general, not necessarily the guy you're responding to) seem to think that a divorce court judge hell bent of fucking you over is going to let a little thing like a contract stop him, especially when the whole premise of family court is that contracts are meaningless if they inconvenience a woman. The only prenups that get enforced are the ones that benefit the woman.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– BeefyBelisarius 21 points 1 year ago +21 / -0

especially when the whole premise of family court is that contracts are meaningless if they inconvenience a woman

Wow, someone who remembers that marriage used to be a legal contract, don't see that very often.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– rebuildingMyself 15 points 1 year ago +15 / -0

Worthless or not, it's a huge red flag if a woman refuses to sign one under any circumstances or acts like a vile bitch if you approach the subject during the relationship phase.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– HallucinatoryBeing 9 points 1 year ago +9 / -0

"I thought you loved me??? DON'T YOU TRUST ME?!?!"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– TheOutlaw 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

It's a good shit test, but marriage is a bad idea for men anyway. It could be useful for sniffing out red flags in LTR prospects that don't immediately set off any alarm bells.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– rebuildingMyself 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Agreed about marriage being a bad deal for men. A saavy woman would agree to any prenups knowing she can get out of it if needed later on by crying in front of a judge.

A similar shit test is discussing paternity testing before signing a birth certificate.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– covok48 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

This is correct.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Galean 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

Is not exactly like that plus he was just so proud

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– covok48 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Still worth doing though. 5% chance of success is better than 0%.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy