Woke warning to anyone interested in Tactical Breach Wizards.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (56)
sorted by:
Blah, blah, blah, way to overcomplicate the circle of life, dude. Kill and eat, and sometimes you'll be the one killed and eaten instead. If you like it or not is irrelevant to nature, red in tooth and claw.
The natural order, as ordained by the almighty God, is fucking brutal. This is self evident if you observe nature enough, but I suppose a soft city boy wouldn't have that experience. Fun fact: quickly killing prey so it doesn't suffer is something that only civilized humans do. Have you any idea how many animals literally eat each other alive?
Humans weren't originally omnivores in the garden of Eden and the Bible says in the end the wolf will live with the lamb so you better get used to not eating animals in eternity. It's only this relatively short period of time on Earth that you will be eating them. There are no slaughterhouses in heaven. It was only after the fall of man that humans were given permission to eat animals, and permission isn't the same as an ideal. I can give my kids permission to eat yummy food but that doesn't mean I'm recommending it as the ideal. I'm talking in terms of moral ideals here — I'm well aware the omnivore diet is the biological ideal in terms of bioavailability of nutrients due to probably evolutionary reasons to do with what our ancestors ate. But this doesn't entail it's the moral ideal.
I have no problem with you eating carnivores as they're going to inevitably kill a whole bunch of peaceful nonaggressive herbivores so the rule of self defence applies, it would be a righteous preemptive killing in self defence. Carnivorous cats and dogs shouldn't be exempt from this on the basis "they're our friends so they get special status" cause the vast majority of people are NOT pet owners and are NOT their friends, otherwise a minority could befriend cows and then we couldn't eat cows anymore, plus the whole thing is an appeal to population fallacy anyway. When I try to help stray cats I feed them artificial kibble which contains synthetic supplements. These haven't been proven broadly but it's better than killing them, I would rather be a bit malnourished than dead. You hate me cause I think animal lives matter, stop being so demonic please. Like I said you wouldn't get angry if an animal defended their own life so why care if I defend them. Just calm down bro.
We live in neither the garden nor the hereafter; the bodies we currently inhabit were clearly designed as omnivorous predators. No less than Saint Peter was given a vision from God in the book of Acts telling him to kill and eat any sort of animals, so the strawman you built of people who disagree with your diet being demonic is ridiculous. If meat is personally a stumbling block for you then fine, abstain. But don't presume it's like that for the rest of us.
That was after the fall of man tho. Why did humans start eating animals after the fall?
Maybe there was a physical, internal change to our nutrition requirements after being cast out? Or maybe there was a perfect food source in the garden that we no longer have access to? Either way it isn't really relevant to the situation we currently exist in. The garden isn't for us anymore.