You call "the police officer who attacked a man that was fighting him, only did so to hopefully kill the german by holding him down and allowing the islamist to stab him" is pattern recognition?
No, faggot. That's not pattern recognition, it's called being an absolute retard and willfully seeing shit that isn't there.
it's called being an absolute retard and willfully seeing shit that isn't there.
Speaking of, reread what I initially said. I said 'so', not 'so that'. 'So 'by itself as a conjunction can have a meaning of result (regardless of intent). X happened, so y happened. There needn't have been intent, but there is a causal link. The causal link was my focus. 'So that' has the intent/purpose meaning more fully. I only said 'so', deliberately so.
Pot meet kettle, you're doing everything you accuse me of.
You're a liar. This narrative that the police officer did everything in his power to protect a terrorist at the cost of his own life, and for the expense of a german, comes mostly from right-wing memes trying to represent the dichotomy of the german state; but then people like you took it literally. Then you hyperbolized your own misconception and tried to repeat it as fact because it fits your narrative.
Don't give me this sophistic crap about what you really meant. You said what you meant the first time. If I had said anything that was wrong, you would have brought it up initially instead of crying 'how dare you call me racist!'
These are the same thing. I'll re-explain this because you didn't listen.
I don't care that OP's a racist, it is the mechanism of his retardation. Get over it.
You don't care that he is a racist, yet you attacked him as a racist for having working pattern recognition. I was listening just fine.
Calling you an idiot, and being offended are not the same thing.
You call "the police officer who attacked a man that was fighting him, only did so to hopefully kill the german by holding him down and allowing the islamist to stab him" is pattern recognition?
No, faggot. That's not pattern recognition, it's called being an absolute retard and willfully seeing shit that isn't there.
Speaking of, reread what I initially said. I said 'so', not 'so that'. 'So 'by itself as a conjunction can have a meaning of result (regardless of intent). X happened, so y happened. There needn't have been intent, but there is a causal link. The causal link was my focus. 'So that' has the intent/purpose meaning more fully. I only said 'so', deliberately so.
Pot meet kettle, you're doing everything you accuse me of.
You're a liar. This narrative that the police officer did everything in his power to protect a terrorist at the cost of his own life, and for the expense of a german, comes mostly from right-wing memes trying to represent the dichotomy of the german state; but then people like you took it literally. Then you hyperbolized your own misconception and tried to repeat it as fact because it fits your narrative.
Don't give me this sophistic crap about what you really meant. You said what you meant the first time. If I had said anything that was wrong, you would have brought it up initially instead of crying 'how dare you call me racist!'