Then you don't understand why people don't like JD Vance. He's a tradcuck. He believes men should be enslaved to the State and to Women for "mah babies". He'll punish men for not enslaving themselves to women and refuse to force women to improve themselves nor make the situation better for men such that men have incentive to have children. If there's anyone who will table a tax on single people, it'll be JD Vance.
lol, speaking of, he tried posting about that recent Reddit thread calling having a family a fetish over on the "Funny" board.
Now first off, /Funny isn't funny most of the time so his post going down like a lead balloon is ironically not out of place there.
Second, to the surprise of nobody those who knows how the posts he still rants about the usual crap* regardless of what the topic might be. Even when he's the one making a thread about something.
Third, as is tradition he got downvoted to oblivion for continuing to be completely retarded.
Edit: Some highlights of what "the usual crap" is when in a thread about families having children.
wanting that many kids is a fetish
This is at least on topic. The rest however...
handshake
Because he still doesn't understand how the site as a whole works.
Melinda
Because why the fuck not? ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Could you fit any more buzzwords in there?
The irony of this considering what follows is as the kids say: "peak".
"trans agenda"
JK Rowling
TERFism
All of those from the same post, mind.
Yawn...
One of his typical deflections.
tl;dr he treats every single poster he replies to as both a brand new person, "handshakes", and yet as if it's someone who would know the ins and outs of all the random colloquialisms he repeatedly uses over and over, "Melinda", "Yawn", and more.
So he's still as unhinged as ever.
Funny thing is I didn't even realise it was him posting that thread when I saw it at first. I just found both the post and OP comments to be retarded and downvoted both as such. Then the reason for it being retarded become apparent when I took a second look whom the OP was.
Also, you're not going to be enslaved to women. You get to choose if you want to be married. This is like the right wing version of the reaction to Jordan Peterson's "enforced monogamy"
Sen. JD Vance has a history of making disparaging remarks toward people without children, a CNN KFile review of his comments shows, including fundraising off his now-infamous “childless cat lady” remarks in a series of emails that called Democratic leaders “childless sociopaths” who “don’t have a direct stake in this country.”
In November 2020, Vance said on a conservative podcast that childless Americans, especially those in the country’s “leadership class,” were “more sociopathic” than those with children and made the country “less mentally stable.” Vance added that the “most deranged” and “most psychotic” commentators on Twitter – now known as X - were typically childless.
Vance, adding that his remarks were not about criticizing people without children, but rather focused on policy and claimed the Democratic Party has become “anti-family” and “anti-child.”
“There are just these basic cadences of life that I think are really powerful and really valuable when you have kids in your life,” Vance said in November 2020 on a conservative podcast. “And the fact that so many people, especially in America’s leadership class, just don’t have that in their lives.”
“You know, I worry that it makes people more sociopathic and ultimately our whole country a little bit less, less mentally stable,” he said. “And of course, you talk about going on Twitter – final point I’ll make is you go on Twitter and almost always the people who are most deranged and most psychotic are people who don’t have kids at home.”
In another tweet a month later, Vance wrote, “Our country’s low birth rates have made many elites sociopaths.”
Vance spokesperson Taylor Van Kirk said, “As [Senator Vance] has clearly stated, he was talking about politicians on the left who support policies that are explicitly anti-child and anti-family. The media can obsess over it all they want, but he’s not going to back down when it comes to advocating for policies that protect parental rights and encourage people to have more kids.”
The writing is on the wall. Enjoy slaving away for women! There's no way in hell some dude who married an Indian woman is going to promote patriarchal values to help promote the family and kids. He's going to extract every last resource he can from men to give to his precious women. The fact some of you can't see that is ridiculous.
Men are going to get fucked over no matter who gets elected.
The definition of tradcuck is someone who promotes traditional family values but does so in a manner that benefits women to the detriment of men. His words reveal he cares about traditional family values (having children) and I am making the assumption, he likely will promote these in a manner that is pro-women and anti-men. It is speculation but I think it's good speculation. Usually, the men in modernity who see married men as superior to unmarried men are almost always cucks. I've seen it a million times already on CuckPro.
Then you don't understand why people don't like JD Vance. He's a tradcuck. He believes men should be enslaved to the State and to Women for "mah babies". He'll punish men for not enslaving themselves to women and refuse to force women to improve themselves nor make the situation better for men such that men have incentive to have children. If there's anyone who will table a tax on single people, it'll be JD Vance.
calm down imp
lol, speaking of, he tried posting about that recent Reddit thread calling having a family a fetish over on the "Funny" board.
Now first off, /Funny isn't funny most of the time so his post going down like a lead balloon is ironically not out of place there.
Second, to the surprise of nobody
thosewho knows howthe posts he still rants about the usual crap* regardless of what the topic might be. Even when he's the one making a thread about something.Third, as is tradition he got downvoted to oblivion for continuing to be completely retarded.
https://communities.win/c/Funny/p/1995H1ADJ5/its-a-fetish-you-fucking-losers-/c
Edit: Some highlights of what "the usual crap" is when in a thread about families having children.
This is at least on topic. The rest however...
Because he still doesn't understand how the site as a whole works.
Because why the fuck not? ¯_(ツ)_/¯
The irony of this considering what follows is as the kids say: "peak".
All of those from the same post, mind.
One of his typical deflections.
tl;dr he treats every single poster he replies to as both a brand new person, "handshakes", and yet as if it's someone who would know the ins and outs of all the random colloquialisms he repeatedly uses over and over, "Melinda", "Yawn", and more.
So he's still as unhinged as ever.
Funny thing is I didn't even realise it was him posting that thread when I saw it at first. I just found both the post and OP comments to be retarded and downvoted both as such. Then the reason for it being retarded become apparent when I took a second look whom the OP was.
He also made a whole community just to summon me there.
https://scored.co/c/TheCultureWar/p/17txoa4Bj5/the-feminist-regime-is-installed/c
He's gotten nuttier and nuttier since 10/7.
Did something happen to his family on 10/7?
He's literally not a tradcuck, but okay.
Also, you're not going to be enslaved to women. You get to choose if you want to be married. This is like the right wing version of the reaction to Jordan Peterson's "enforced monogamy"
The writing is on the wall. Enjoy slaving away for women! There's no way in hell some dude who married an Indian woman is going to promote patriarchal values to help promote the family and kids. He's going to extract every last resource he can from men to give to his precious women. The fact some of you can't see that is ridiculous.
Men are going to get fucked over no matter who gets elected.
You posted that as if I didn't agree with it.
Then you're a tradcuck.
No. JD Vance is not a tradcuck, he just wants people to have children instead of us dying on a civilizational demographic bomb.
The definition of tradcuck is someone who promotes traditional family values but does so in a manner that benefits women to the detriment of men. His words reveal he cares about traditional family values (having children) and I am making the assumption, he likely will promote these in a manner that is pro-women and anti-men. It is speculation but I think it's good speculation. Usually, the men in modernity who see married men as superior to unmarried men are almost always cucks. I've seen it a million times already on CuckPro.