This happened in the Haitian revolution too. The race traitors who supported them were killed because the Haitians hadn't satiated their blood lust. As far as the Haitians were concerned, one White was as good as another.
They weren't race traitors, they were anti-slavery. And it wasn't Haitian blood lust, it was Rousseauianism, and the same thing had literally just happened in their mother country for the same reasons by the same people.
Yeah, because it's not sex slavery, it's forced marriage. Those are two completely different concepts. The women were not chattel, they even got to chose their husbands. Now, it's still genocide, but it's not slavery.
It would be equivalent to calling France a slave-state prior to the revolution because they had kings. Even with an absolute monarch, they wouldn't be slaves. You're conflating two different concepts.
All “allies” will inevitably be discarded and stabbed in the back at some point.
I’m from South Africa. I’ve seen this happen to white knight liberals over and over since the mid 90’s.
This happened in the Haitian revolution too. The race traitors who supported them were killed because the Haitians hadn't satiated their blood lust. As far as the Haitians were concerned, one White was as good as another.
They weren't race traitors, they were anti-slavery. And it wasn't Haitian blood lust, it was Rousseauianism, and the same thing had literally just happened in their mother country for the same reasons by the same people.
You’re the dumbass who said that when they killed the white women’s families and forced them to marry blacks, it wasn’t sex slavery because the women were married. I don’t feel inclined to listen to you about the racial politics of anything.
Yeah, because it's not sex slavery, it's forced marriage. Those are two completely different concepts. The women were not chattel, they even got to chose their husbands. Now, it's still genocide, but it's not slavery.
It would be equivalent to calling France a slave-state prior to the revolution because they had kings. Even with an absolute monarch, they wouldn't be slaves. You're conflating two different concepts.