Reprisal attacks on alleged race crimes are always inherently unjust
There you go, I just did.
Did I stutter? Or did you somehow think I didn't include white lynchings and genocides on that? Do you seriously think I blame the Ethnic English for the crimes of Socialism, when it is their war that helped to end it?
Margarine, we have our fights, but I would hope you would learn at this point that I am always fundamentally opposed to racialism. Not: racialism for some but not others, all of them.
As there is no justice in the Holocaust, there is also:
No justice in the Haitain white genocide
No justice in post-war atrocities against ethnic Germans
No justice in the Fabian Socialist Frankfurt Schools """""De-Nazification Program""""" which blamed all ethnic Germans for a racial inferiority which made them inter-temporally susceptible to authoritarianism.
No justice in the ethnic cleansings of King Phillips War
No justice in Nat Turner's ethnic cleansing
No justice in the Powhatan massacre
Do you get it yet? Are you confused? Or are you just going to reject your eyes again and call me a jew?
Pretty much any given wall of text you've posted in a thread where Jews are engaging in bad behavior and White people are taking exception to said behavior. This has been a trend with you for years as you are well aware.
Speaking more generally, I think one of the flaws in your framework might be that because you object to "racialism" across the board, you are unable to distinguish between attack and defense. An attack that is racial in nature will necessarily require a defense that is racial in nature. Were such a defense to be mounted, you would only be able to discern its racial nature and interpret it as a racial attack and consequently sperg out as is your wont.
It's not a flaw. It's a feature. I'm not tolerating an attack or defense argument at all. This is because there is no defensive argument. One does not exist. Just because you blame all jews for something a Communist did, doesn't mean you get to kill your half-jewish neighbor in a reprisal attack. You call that "defense", I call that an unjustified attack on an innocent person.
This is because, fundamentally, the effort to declare collective crimes is always intentionally capricious. Declaring race crimes allows anyone to be attacked for any perceived violation of no law. This is because no race can commit a crime. So, you simply make an assertion, declare guilt, and then attack any number of people you chose, without trial, at your leisure. It's not justice, it's terrorism, and it should be met with violent self-defense as your terrorism is conducted.
You don't have a defense. Racialism is not justifiable. You are required to treat people as they act, not as you capriciously declare them to act as a collective based on your own bigotry.
If you did get your way, then you would earn the very violence you claim to defend yourself against, because the people attacking you will make the EXACT same "defense" argument 100% of the time. "Lowercase W white People are using the Police to Genocide blacks! 14,000 unarmed Uppercase B Black people are killed every year!" was the last one that was used. And so therefore, somehow, their 155 consecutive days of Krystalnacht was somehow legitimate using your bullshit logic.
Reprisal attacks on alleged race crimes are always inherently unjust
There you go, I just did.
Did I stutter? Or did you somehow think I didn't include white lynchings and genocides on that? Do you seriously think I blame the Ethnic English for the crimes of Socialism, when it is their war that helped to end it?
Margarine, we have our fights, but I would hope you would learn at this point that I am always fundamentally opposed to racialism. Not: racialism for some but not others, all of them.
As there is no justice in the Holocaust, there is also:
Do you get it yet? Are you confused? Or are you just going to reject your eyes again and call me a jew?
I'm making fun of you for being a hypocrite because you sperg out whenever Whites try to defend themselves against such attacks.
You're a liar.
Show me one instance where I objected to one case of legitimate self-defense.
Or are you going to say that racialist laws, that I already told you I don't support, are "defending themselves".
Pretty much any given wall of text you've posted in a thread where Jews are engaging in bad behavior and White people are taking exception to said behavior. This has been a trend with you for years as you are well aware.
Speaking more generally, I think one of the flaws in your framework might be that because you object to "racialism" across the board, you are unable to distinguish between attack and defense. An attack that is racial in nature will necessarily require a defense that is racial in nature. Were such a defense to be mounted, you would only be able to discern its racial nature and interpret it as a racial attack and consequently sperg out as is your wont.
It's not a flaw. It's a feature. I'm not tolerating an attack or defense argument at all. This is because there is no defensive argument. One does not exist. Just because you blame all jews for something a Communist did, doesn't mean you get to kill your half-jewish neighbor in a reprisal attack. You call that "defense", I call that an unjustified attack on an innocent person.
This is because, fundamentally, the effort to declare collective crimes is always intentionally capricious. Declaring race crimes allows anyone to be attacked for any perceived violation of no law. This is because no race can commit a crime. So, you simply make an assertion, declare guilt, and then attack any number of people you chose, without trial, at your leisure. It's not justice, it's terrorism, and it should be met with violent self-defense as your terrorism is conducted.
You don't have a defense. Racialism is not justifiable. You are required to treat people as they act, not as you capriciously declare them to act as a collective based on your own bigotry.
If you did get your way, then you would earn the very violence you claim to defend yourself against, because the people attacking you will make the EXACT same "defense" argument 100% of the time. "Lowercase W white People are using the Police to Genocide blacks! 14,000 unarmed Uppercase B Black people are killed every year!" was the last one that was used. And so therefore, somehow, their 155 consecutive days of Krystalnacht was somehow legitimate using your bullshit logic.