It's not just a matter of "rules for thee and not for me." I've had this same argument with my Boomer parents, who were terrified by the MSM hype and all aboard the lockdown and vaccine mandate trains. Every time I bring up the public health officials and the government officials having parties while everyone was locked down, they just wave it away with, "well they don't think the rules apply to them."
That explanation works when you're dealing with tax fraud, or your typical bribery and corruption scandals. But you have to remember at the peak of the Plandemic hysteria these people were raining apocalyptic rhetoric down from on high.
Every time someone tries to dismiss it in the same way they do your average corruption from politicians, just try to make them think about it for a minute. We committed economic suicide, retarded the psychosocial development of an entire generation of children and undermined the financial future of everyone in our societies, and we did it because enough people were convinced that millions would die if we didn't.
If this degenerate pajeet faggot genuinely believed the things he was saying at the time about how dangerous Covid was, would he have risked his health with these activities? If Nancy Pelosi and Gavin Newsom genuinely believed that the lockdowns were the only thing standing between Californians and piles of corpses in the streets, would they have risked going to fancy restaurants or hair salons? If Barack Obama had believed it, would he have been risking his family's health by hosting parties at his house? If Boris Johnson and the entire British establishment had really believed the sacrifices they were demanding of ordinary people were necessary to save lives, would they have been so flippant about partying in Downing Street?
No, they never took it seriously because they always knew it wasn't serious.
If I were a real high IQ fella I would reduce this truly excellent post into a sort of catchphrase that communicates what you've said in only a few words. But just saying "they lied, people died" doesnt seem to communicate it well enough. They deliberately lied for the intended purpose of causing terror and then the cover of terror was used to transfer unfathomable wealth away from the working class of the country and defraud US elections.
This was a democide by the government, who crushed dissent, and sought to compel people into forced medical experimentation, or in some cases simply death (see the fatality rate of ventilators + remdesivir).
They don't just think the rules don't apply to them, this particular guy spells it out that because he makes the rules, he felt in control, so it wasn't bad. He intentionally scared you, because he could. He intentionally oppressed you, because he could. He didn't enforce rules against himself, because he could.
He asserted he did what he did because MIGHT MAKES RIGHT.
He excuses his lies with an appeal to power alone. This is what validated mass murder.
They always claimed it was masses of people doing things that was the problem. That's why they feel comfortable doing it when the masses aren't. That said, the problem was overblown.
It's not just a matter of "rules for thee and not for me." I've had this same argument with my Boomer parents, who were terrified by the MSM hype and all aboard the lockdown and vaccine mandate trains. Every time I bring up the public health officials and the government officials having parties while everyone was locked down, they just wave it away with, "well they don't think the rules apply to them."
That explanation works when you're dealing with tax fraud, or your typical bribery and corruption scandals. But you have to remember at the peak of the Plandemic hysteria these people were raining apocalyptic rhetoric down from on high.
Every time someone tries to dismiss it in the same way they do your average corruption from politicians, just try to make them think about it for a minute. We committed economic suicide, retarded the psychosocial development of an entire generation of children and undermined the financial future of everyone in our societies, and we did it because enough people were convinced that millions would die if we didn't.
If this degenerate pajeet faggot genuinely believed the things he was saying at the time about how dangerous Covid was, would he have risked his health with these activities? If Nancy Pelosi and Gavin Newsom genuinely believed that the lockdowns were the only thing standing between Californians and piles of corpses in the streets, would they have risked going to fancy restaurants or hair salons? If Barack Obama had believed it, would he have been risking his family's health by hosting parties at his house? If Boris Johnson and the entire British establishment had really believed the sacrifices they were demanding of ordinary people were necessary to save lives, would they have been so flippant about partying in Downing Street?
No, they never took it seriously because they always knew it wasn't serious.
Never stop reminding people of that.
If I were a real high IQ fella I would reduce this truly excellent post into a sort of catchphrase that communicates what you've said in only a few words. But just saying "they lied, people died" doesnt seem to communicate it well enough. They deliberately lied for the intended purpose of causing terror and then the cover of terror was used to transfer unfathomable wealth away from the working class of the country and defraud US elections.
You're completely right.
This was a democide by the government, who crushed dissent, and sought to compel people into forced medical experimentation, or in some cases simply death (see the fatality rate of ventilators + remdesivir).
They don't just think the rules don't apply to them, this particular guy spells it out that because he makes the rules, he felt in control, so it wasn't bad. He intentionally scared you, because he could. He intentionally oppressed you, because he could. He didn't enforce rules against himself, because he could.
He asserted he did what he did because MIGHT MAKES RIGHT.
He excuses his lies with an appeal to power alone. This is what validated mass murder.
They always claimed it was masses of people doing things that was the problem. That's why they feel comfortable doing it when the masses aren't. That said, the problem was overblown.