Latest RANGZ of Power banner. FUCKING LOL
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
I mean I thought the hobbit wasn't bad just stretched out needlessly as it should've just been two films.
This shit is so bad that it makes you want to chuck all the people involved in it into the Somme so they can 'learn the author's roots'..
There are a couple fan mashups you can download on the internet of all 3 movies squeezed into a single one, but with all the non-canon scenes removed. I think that the most famous of those is "The Hobbit: The Tolkien Edit". Instead of having an overinflated 9+ hour trilogy filled with ridiculous scenes like a Radagast rabbit-sled chase, asinine and useless love stories and crossdressing, you get a single condensed 4h30 movie. It's a much better experience overall, with the only real downside being sometimes having shortened day-night cycles.
I've seen the Tolkien Edit, and I'm a fan. It's definitely a bit jarring at times, but it's very watchable.
I've said this before. I hated Tauriel. I'm pretty much a purist, and I thought the addition was stupid (tbf, there are many additions to the Hobbit movies that are stupid). A friend of mine had a daughter who was maybe 8-9 when the movies came out. She became a huge Tauriel fan, read the Hobbit, read the Lord of the Rings, etc. I would rather have a small bit player added to the story, a small inconsequential character who doesn't really change anything, than doing what Hollywood normally does--taking random female character and making her an empowered (probably raceswapped poc) bossbitch.
So today, I basically just ignore Tauriel.
At least they picked Kate from Lost when she was still decently hot instead of an ugly negress - like the "Julietz"
Cast them into the fires of mount doom
The volcano would spit this abomination out.