I read what was freely available for the article. It's interesting how with the way Hanson writes, he's implying that Jews were completely divorced from what the Soviet Union was at the time of WWII. Even if Stalin had purged all the higher ups who helped create the Soviet Union, the fall to Marxism was still initiated by "what [Hitler] called Jewish Bolshevism", which is probably why the dictator felt them responsible and wanted to eliminate their people entirely.
Well yes, that is the shibboleth required to be published. I find the writings of the Chief of the Army General Staff about liquidating civilian Russians to be more troubling.
I'm all about the debate itself. If there's points to be made, let's hear them. It's the constant seething and REEEing at the idea that the Narrative is being challenged at all is the scary part to me.
They never point out any specifics when condemning people or put out counter arguments. It’s always just stating the conclusion. Never an explanation. At most they’ll say something was debunked or discredited but never go into how or why.
Same thing happened at the Olympics with the XY guys punching the XX girls out in boxing. They just called the past tests proving XY discredited. They then refused to just do another test or anything. Simple test too. Same day results. Wouldn’t even need blood. Just hair.
I'm seeing plenty of condemnation and plenty of name calling toward Tucker.
But near zero calling him wrong about it.
Not casting my lot with either side, but Victor Davis Hanson had a decent rebuttal (unfortunately half locked behind a paywall). This kind of sober tone should have characterized the response.
I read what was freely available for the article. It's interesting how with the way Hanson writes, he's implying that Jews were completely divorced from what the Soviet Union was at the time of WWII. Even if Stalin had purged all the higher ups who helped create the Soviet Union, the fall to Marxism was still initiated by "what [Hitler] called Jewish Bolshevism", which is probably why the dictator felt them responsible and wanted to eliminate their people entirely.
Well yes, that is the shibboleth required to be published. I find the writings of the Chief of the Army General Staff about liquidating civilian Russians to be more troubling.
I'm all about the debate itself. If there's points to be made, let's hear them. It's the constant seething and REEEing at the idea that the Narrative is being challenged at all is the scary part to me.
They never point out any specifics when condemning people or put out counter arguments. It’s always just stating the conclusion. Never an explanation. At most they’ll say something was debunked or discredited but never go into how or why.
Same thing happened at the Olympics with the XY guys punching the XX girls out in boxing. They just called the past tests proving XY discredited. They then refused to just do another test or anything. Simple test too. Same day results. Wouldn’t even need blood. Just hair.