So we're going with "fuck the users", is that it? Personally I think the functionality of their website is their responsibility and not everyone else's.
It's a "I refuse to use Chrome" problem, sure. I'm not going to not use a privacy focused browser. If a website won't function on it, oh well. It's probably because they wanted tracking data I don't want them to have.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. When archive actually functions properly, then you have some basis for this attitude.
But it doesn't. Hell it doesn't even work at all on any browser worth a crap.
Your technological illiteracy is not acceptable, nor an excuse.
So we're going with "fuck the users", is that it? Personally I think the functionality of their website is their responsibility and not everyone else's.
Archive sites work perfectly fine. This is a you problem.
I understand that hearing that hurts your ego but I don't care. You needed to hear it.
It's a "I refuse to use Chrome" problem, sure. I'm not going to not use a privacy focused browser. If a website won't function on it, oh well. It's probably because they wanted tracking data I don't want them to have.
so post the link then
If you don't want to support the journo, find a different source and stop reading their rag.
either way, archive.is and ghost archive work fine on all machines I've tried. Stop being lazy.