The amount of idiots siding with the brazilian judge is retarded. I remember when banning vpns was a sign of a totalitarian regime
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
The amount of idiots siding with the brazilian judge is retarded. I remember when banning vpns was a sign of a totalitarian regime
Your mistake lies in assuming that any leftist, ever, is actually anti authoritarian. They're not.
They're anti moral authority, anti decency and anti truth. Any just, right or good authority they chafe against. But even in the same breath they'll demand accession to bizarre or nonsensical rules, even purely made up ones.
The common factor is that a leftist will always side with evil. They will contort themselves and whatever their supposed beliefs are to align with whatever is the most wicked outcome. They'll contradict themselves in the same sentence and won't bat an eye.
Being comfortable with hypocrisy is a hallmark of evil.
leftists are not pro or anti anything really. they have no convictions. They will go with whatever their anointed leaders tell them to go with.
they will cheer on genocide if Obama tells them it's good.
They are and they do, and it's the media. Obama was just their PR guy and now it's Kamala.
I disagree. there are some leftists who legitimately like harris, but the majority seem to reluctantly back her because she's not Trump. the memes and clips of her making retarded statements seem to have entered the leftist cultural sphere.
Obama, however, is their patron saint. Every leftist loves Obama unconditionally.
That's the thing, I'm honest on who I am and what I think and am consistent as a result, the leftoids can't fucking manage that.
I don't think it's about good or evil, it's about a means to an end but I'm just nitpicking. The reason I think that is when you see them try and justify themselves and their viewpoints they'll practically tell you that, in fact I remember Vaush saying the quiet part out loud and I'm paraphrasing but it was something along the lines of him not giving a fuck and just wanting to win.
The right don't understand this, which is why I frequently take the piss because they're still thinking they can debate using logic and reason and don't understand why the average leftist can and will just make shit up on the spot about them and then attack them on that purely to win. This is what happens with every issue the left decide to pick up on and the right fall for the bait every single time so I just walk away from people who claim to be opposed to the left and don't understand this. It's an effective tactic as well because it means that right wingers especially sit there constantly trying to defend themselves when the left had zero intention of honestly confronting them about anything in the first place.
If you aren't actively seeking the good, then you are either actively evil, or at best are being cowardly in enabling evil.
You won't convince the leftist, but you might convince the centrist who observes the argument.