This is a twofold issue, both having the root cause of feminism.
Boys in the West were taught in a female focus education system, depriving many of the knowledge of being dominate and how to properly and efficiently exert control.
Then you have women being easily emotionally manipulated to vote in politicians like Biden, Starmer, Trudeau etc who 'say things nicer than the other candidate' as they let in mass third world immigration, stifle rights and deprive their populations of economic opportunities.
Repealing the 19th ain't enough, I'd rather have a 'managed democracy' done by an AI not made in ANY commie state to decide as we have too many simp men thanks to said feminist education system.
That was more a shitpost statement mocking current democracy.
In truth, especially with America as an example since you had the perfect framework with the constitution, I don't think most places can handle democracy UNLESS it is racially homogeneous, has established traditions and a majority native religion.
Without ALL those factors, you're better off going back to monarchy.
Purist democracy will always fail. The US was founded with limited voting rights in mind - universal suffrage was the death knell. In the modern corrupted system, simply reverting to land ownership would be insufficient, but for the time period it was much better.
In modern day I'd suggest a starship troopers style system of franchise only being earned through potentially deadly personal civic service.
Democracy might be alot more appealing if the system we currently have in place actually listened when the will of the people spoke.
Instead we have a set of so-called 'elites' who think they know better.
I've hammered this before, but I'll do it again; The gay marriage vote failed in California. California. It only got on the books due to legislation from the bench. Unchecked immigration is universally unpopular, and yet...
Before we get back to disenfranchisement and a better constitutional republic, we'd best deal with said 'elites' so they don't get in the way.
Even if racially homogeneous, democracy fails when we have reached sufficient technological proficiency that we promote dysgenic life that has no skin in the system.
Anyone advocating for AI making decisions is absolutely ignorant of AI and has no more business exerting political influence than women do. I've seen far too much of that lately for my taste and think we would do well to openly mock people for being that stupid.
This is a twofold issue, both having the root cause of feminism.
Boys in the West were taught in a female focus education system, depriving many of the knowledge of being dominate and how to properly and efficiently exert control.
Then you have women being easily emotionally manipulated to vote in politicians like Biden, Starmer, Trudeau etc who 'say things nicer than the other candidate' as they let in mass third world immigration, stifle rights and deprive their populations of economic opportunities.
Repealing the 19th ain't enough, I'd rather have a 'managed democracy' done by an AI not made in ANY commie state to decide as we have too many simp men thanks to said feminist education system.
You had me until "muh AI".
That was more a shitpost statement mocking current democracy.
In truth, especially with America as an example since you had the perfect framework with the constitution, I don't think most places can handle democracy UNLESS it is racially homogeneous, has established traditions and a majority native religion.
Without ALL those factors, you're better off going back to monarchy.
let’s face it, it’s only working if it’s white european or east asian racially homogenized society
Yeah, don't forget that Liberia was set up with a copy of the US Constitution.
Now now, Somaliland proved Africans CAN make a successful peaceful society thanks to retaining tribal heritage.
But yeah most other places are fucked when it comes to democracy.
Purist democracy will always fail. The US was founded with limited voting rights in mind - universal suffrage was the death knell. In the modern corrupted system, simply reverting to land ownership would be insufficient, but for the time period it was much better.
In modern day I'd suggest a starship troopers style system of franchise only being earned through potentially deadly personal civic service.
Democracy might be alot more appealing if the system we currently have in place actually listened when the will of the people spoke.
Instead we have a set of so-called 'elites' who think they know better.
I've hammered this before, but I'll do it again; The gay marriage vote failed in California. California. It only got on the books due to legislation from the bench. Unchecked immigration is universally unpopular, and yet...
Before we get back to disenfranchisement and a better constitutional republic, we'd best deal with said 'elites' so they don't get in the way.
Go Robert Heinlein. TANFL
I don't think you even need to go that far to have profound change:
Would drastically reshape the voting landscape.
Even if racially homogeneous, democracy fails when we have reached sufficient technological proficiency that we promote dysgenic life that has no skin in the system.
eh. id be fine with the idea if I get to program said AI.
Same.
Anyone advocating for AI making decisions is absolutely ignorant of AI and has no more business exerting political influence than women do. I've seen far too much of that lately for my taste and think we would do well to openly mock people for being that stupid.