A few people had mentioned that 'Twisters' didn't invoke climate change, so I thought cool -- a few special effects and a fun few hours.
Then it starts -- two white chicks and three pajeets! And... there are, actually, some astonishingly good-looking pajeets, but they chose the weak-chinned losers, of course.
I lasted about five minutes.
I wish we could put pajeets, chicks and (the rule-16 people) on an island, and see what they'd create.
We all know that they'd do nothing but argue.
But hey, Madame Curie was, like, super good at putting samples into a machine that she didn't build.
Sorry, just ranting.
You remind me of something I notice. I will watch some b movie from the 80s or 90s on Tubi or one of the other free streaming and I think it’s brilliant when I probably wouldn’t have liked it back then since blockbusters were being cranked out. My general rule of thumb is to not watch or read anything past 2014. So nowadays it’s really nice to watch something from heck even 20 years ago where there isn’t an obsession with diversity or before they decided that lgbt had to be in everything (or the black/lgbt/girl power trifecta).
Also watching a period piece from the past is great since they made a much better effort of actually looking like the period they are depicting
You know what else isn't in modern action movies these days, boobs. Watch action movies from the 70s to the 90s and you see boobs. Nowadays no boobs
Yes! But they will show topless or naked men. I don’t see anything wrong if they want to appeal to men and women with the opposite sex
Women don't really think about men that way. They might now -- but only because of mass media.
The 'topless men' thing is more of an attempt to turn men gay.
(I know that sounds crazy)