It's at the gym and going running in tight pants. Even the kitchen one could easily be a fitness picture too (or an attempt at it given her attire, she's got a bit of a muffin top going on hanging over the tight pants).
Nah, that's fat. Especially the one in the green tights in the gym. Just look at the ratio of upper to lower leg. That's either a freak of nature or landwhale territory, but certainly not muscle.
Forget ratio, look for definition*. That's a massive quad. Freak.
I reverse image searched just now, looks like I was right,, looks like it's Kiri Sokolsky/kirifitness_
Sure, looking like she's in a bulk phase when that photo was taken as compared to her cuts, and remembering that a woman's body fat % should be a bit higher with less definition, but I am right.
What it is is fundamental to the morals of it. Is it something hard to attain and which requires work and time for a fitness enthusiast? Or is it something any casual sloth and gluttony fan can get doing nothing.
You are dodging the question, and I highly suspect it's on purpose because you don't want to admit the answer. Throwing up a bullshit smokescreen that is non sequitur to the issue. Women in the 90s and before were just as capable of putting hard work and time as fitness enthusiasts, and did so more than they do now. And the end result wasn't an ass that takes up 1/4 of her body mass. The result was a body like the women in the first set of images. So, ignoring your irrelevant point about how much work it takes to look like a white Shaquanda, women 20 years ago didn't want to. Now they do. Why?
And the moral quality of a white woman trying to look like what black men find attractive is quite simple. It's absolute filth and degeneracy.
All this is in quite the contrast to your OP
My question is, do you think it was deliberately pushed on us by the malicious powers that be, or was it just a natural shift, like as Americans got fatter in general, fatter women who at least kind of wear it better than a blob became the new beauty standard? A bit of both? Any other reasons or factors you might think contributed to it?
It looks like you're already certain of the answer.
I'm not the one dodging anything, it's you being disingenuous. I'm rejecting the premise that they (your examples at least) are fat arsed. It's something else entirely, fitness. They don't share much except size.
Why do I think it is? I don't know. The whole thicc black and big booty latina influence might play a part. So might social media accelerating shifts like that, what once took centuries or decades is now only a generation. But then why wouldn't they just eat their way to that 'ideal' then? It's a million times easier. That's why I think something else is going on.
Are you genuinely retarded? You posted an unflattering picture of a bikini model on an abusive cycle and genuinely think it is fat? She has ab definition in most of her posts.
Look at where 2 of those 3 pics are.
It's at the gym and going running in tight pants. Even the kitchen one could easily be a fitness picture too (or an attempt at it given her attire, she's got a bit of a muffin top going on hanging over the tight pants).
It's fit not fat.
Nah, that's fat. Especially the one in the green tights in the gym. Just look at the ratio of upper to lower leg. That's either a freak of nature or landwhale territory, but certainly not muscle.
Forget ratio, look for definition*. That's a massive quad. Freak.
I reverse image searched just now, looks like I was right,, looks like it's Kiri Sokolsky/kirifitness_
Sure, looking like she's in a bulk phase when that photo was taken as compared to her cuts, and remembering that a woman's body fat % should be a bit higher with less definition, but I am right.
It's ugly. Don't care if it's muscle or fat.
What it is is fundamental to the morals of it. Is it something hard to attain and which requires work and time for a fitness enthusiast? Or is it something any casual sloth and gluttony fan can get doing nothing.
All this is in quite the contrast to your OP
It looks like you're already certain of the answer.
I'm not the one dodging anything, it's you being disingenuous. I'm rejecting the premise that they (your examples at least) are fat arsed. It's something else entirely, fitness. They don't share much except size.
Why do I think it is? I don't know. The whole thicc black and big booty latina influence might play a part. So might social media accelerating shifts like that, what once took centuries or decades is now only a generation. But then why wouldn't they just eat their way to that 'ideal' then? It's a million times easier. That's why I think something else is going on.
Are you genuinely retarded? You posted an unflattering picture of a bikini model on an abusive cycle and genuinely think it is fat? She has ab definition in most of her posts.