OK, let's break this down. Was Einstein the only guy in the history of the world that could've discovered general relativity? If so, him being Jewish is kind of irrelevant no?
If it's possible someone else would've discovered it, then how many gentiles were working in theoretical physics at the time? Quite a few. Is it possible one of them could've discovered it? Absolutely.
Now let's look at the other side. Did Jewish intellectuals found the concepts of cultural relativism, psychoanalysis, and Marxism? Yes. Did Jewish intellectuals advocate for mass migration into European nations? Yes. How many gentiles were thinking along these lines? Almost none.
Is it possible gentiles would have created these fictive ideas by themselves? Not really, no. The possibility is far greater that Jewish intellectualism was a necessary condition, not merely sufficient, for the formation of subversive concepts. These are all attacks from the outgroup on the ingroup.
Jewish individuals made up a majority of Bolshevik leadership. That would be over 2000% overrepresentation.
Was Einstein the only guy in the history of the world that could've discovered general relativity? If so, him being Jewish is kind of irrelevant no?
Well yeah. My point is not that it is relevant, it's that the Nazis only bring up Jewishness when it suits them. And they do it regardless of whether this could have been the only person in all of human history to come up with that idea.
Did Jewish intellectuals found the concepts of cultural relativism, psychoanalysis, and Marxism? Yes.
Let's assume your framing. Were these the only people who could have come up with these ideas? Hardly seems likely.
Clever attempt, but you don't deal with how these ideas actually spread, and among whom. You can also not regard Marxism as emerging in a vacuum. It's the outgrowth of the French Revolution, as the whole idea of socialism itself was.
Did Jewish intellectuals advocate for mass migration into European nations? Yes. How many gentiles were thinking along these lines? Almost none.
I'm not sure what you're basing this on.
The possibility is far greater that Jewish intellectualism was a necessary condition, not merely sufficient, for the formation of subversive concepts. These are all attacks from the outgroup on the ingroup.
It doesn't seem unlikely that people who are in an outgroup would come up with ideas that overturn established ideas. In case of the Bolsheviks, it's not at all surprising that the Jews would be with the people who were not staging pogroms. But you must admit that the people who post these things are not trying to make an intelligent, sophisticated argument like you are, but instead want to say "JEWS BAD". Which is why they bring it up when it's something they don't like and never when they do!
Jewish individuals made up a majority of Bolshevik leadership.
I doubt you're correct about this, but just to be sure: do you mean 'the Politburo', and if so, what year? Or as a whole? That is almost certainly incorrect.
It doesn't seem unlikely that people who are in an outgroup would come up with ideas that overturn established ideas. In case of the Bolsheviks, it's not at all surprising that the Jews would be with the people who were not staging pogroms. But you must admit that the people who post these things are not trying to make an intelligent, sophisticated argument like you are, but instead want to say "JEWS BAD". Which is why they bring it up when it's something they don't like and never when they do!
This has to be the most tortured argument you’ve ever written here. So he’s possibly or even probably right, but you think most of the people who agree with him don’t understand the nuances of why he’s right, and therefore… what exactly? He’s wrong? But you didn’t say that. And even if you had, you would have been engaging in a fallacy.
Further, you imply your belief that anti-Semitism simply falls from the sky. Negative opinion of Jews is always arbitrary and exists as a first order principle, animating and directing all subsequent opinions such that they are inherently invalid, yea? But then why do so many people across so many cultures and nations develop these opinions in mutual isolation? Why do people raised within intensely pro-Jewish cultures (as the West) spontaneously develop negative opinions about the Jewish ethnic cohort? Pattern recognition seems a far greater possibility than “muh papa didn’t like ‘em”.
Guess who came up with General Relativity. You should boycott da Joooz by refusing to use GPS, which relies on it...
OK, let's break this down. Was Einstein the only guy in the history of the world that could've discovered general relativity? If so, him being Jewish is kind of irrelevant no?
If it's possible someone else would've discovered it, then how many gentiles were working in theoretical physics at the time? Quite a few. Is it possible one of them could've discovered it? Absolutely.
Now let's look at the other side. Did Jewish intellectuals found the concepts of cultural relativism, psychoanalysis, and Marxism? Yes. Did Jewish intellectuals advocate for mass migration into European nations? Yes. How many gentiles were thinking along these lines? Almost none.
Is it possible gentiles would have created these fictive ideas by themselves? Not really, no. The possibility is far greater that Jewish intellectualism was a necessary condition, not merely sufficient, for the formation of subversive concepts. These are all attacks from the outgroup on the ingroup.
Jewish individuals made up a majority of Bolshevik leadership. That would be over 2000% overrepresentation.
Well yeah. My point is not that it is relevant, it's that the Nazis only bring up Jewishness when it suits them. And they do it regardless of whether this could have been the only person in all of human history to come up with that idea.
Let's assume your framing. Were these the only people who could have come up with these ideas? Hardly seems likely.
Clever attempt, but you don't deal with how these ideas actually spread, and among whom. You can also not regard Marxism as emerging in a vacuum. It's the outgrowth of the French Revolution, as the whole idea of socialism itself was.
I'm not sure what you're basing this on.
It doesn't seem unlikely that people who are in an outgroup would come up with ideas that overturn established ideas. In case of the Bolsheviks, it's not at all surprising that the Jews would be with the people who were not staging pogroms. But you must admit that the people who post these things are not trying to make an intelligent, sophisticated argument like you are, but instead want to say "JEWS BAD". Which is why they bring it up when it's something they don't like and never when they do!
I doubt you're correct about this, but just to be sure: do you mean 'the Politburo', and if so, what year? Or as a whole? That is almost certainly incorrect.
This has to be the most tortured argument you’ve ever written here. So he’s possibly or even probably right, but you think most of the people who agree with him don’t understand the nuances of why he’s right, and therefore… what exactly? He’s wrong? But you didn’t say that. And even if you had, you would have been engaging in a fallacy.
Further, you imply your belief that anti-Semitism simply falls from the sky. Negative opinion of Jews is always arbitrary and exists as a first order principle, animating and directing all subsequent opinions such that they are inherently invalid, yea? But then why do so many people across so many cultures and nations develop these opinions in mutual isolation? Why do people raised within intensely pro-Jewish cultures (as the West) spontaneously develop negative opinions about the Jewish ethnic cohort? Pattern recognition seems a far greater possibility than “muh papa didn’t like ‘em”.