OK, let's break this down. Was Einstein the only guy in the history of the world that could've discovered general relativity? If so, him being Jewish is kind of irrelevant no?
If it's possible someone else would've discovered it, then how many gentiles were working in theoretical physics at the time? Quite a few. Is it possible one of them could've discovered it? Absolutely.
Now let's look at the other side. Did Jewish intellectuals found the concepts of cultural relativism, psychoanalysis, and Marxism? Yes. Did Jewish intellectuals advocate for mass migration into European nations? Yes. How many gentiles were thinking along these lines? Almost none.
Is it possible gentiles would have created these fictive ideas by themselves? Not really, no. The possibility is far greater that Jewish intellectualism was a necessary condition, not merely sufficient, for the formation of subversive concepts. These are all attacks from the outgroup on the ingroup.
Jewish individuals made up a majority of Bolshevik leadership. That would be over 2000% overrepresentation.
Was Einstein the only guy in the history of the world that could've discovered general relativity? If so, him being Jewish is kind of irrelevant no?
Well yeah. My point is not that it is relevant, it's that the Nazis only bring up Jewishness when it suits them. And they do it regardless of whether this could have been the only person in all of human history to come up with that idea.
Did Jewish intellectuals found the concepts of cultural relativism, psychoanalysis, and Marxism? Yes.
Let's assume your framing. Were these the only people who could have come up with these ideas? Hardly seems likely.
Clever attempt, but you don't deal with how these ideas actually spread, and among whom. You can also not regard Marxism as emerging in a vacuum. It's the outgrowth of the French Revolution, as the whole idea of socialism itself was.
Did Jewish intellectuals advocate for mass migration into European nations? Yes. How many gentiles were thinking along these lines? Almost none.
I'm not sure what you're basing this on.
The possibility is far greater that Jewish intellectualism was a necessary condition, not merely sufficient, for the formation of subversive concepts. These are all attacks from the outgroup on the ingroup.
It doesn't seem unlikely that people who are in an outgroup would come up with ideas that overturn established ideas. In case of the Bolsheviks, it's not at all surprising that the Jews would be with the people who were not staging pogroms. But you must admit that the people who post these things are not trying to make an intelligent, sophisticated argument like you are, but instead want to say "JEWS BAD". Which is why they bring it up when it's something they don't like and never when they do!
Jewish individuals made up a majority of Bolshevik leadership.
I doubt you're correct about this, but just to be sure: do you mean 'the Politburo', and if so, what year? Or as a whole? That is almost certainly incorrect.
It doesn't seem unlikely that people who are in an outgroup would come up with ideas that overturn established ideas. In case of the Bolsheviks, it's not at all surprising that the Jews would be with the people who were not staging pogroms. But you must admit that the people who post these things are not trying to make an intelligent, sophisticated argument like you are, but instead want to say "JEWS BAD". Which is why they bring it up when it's something they don't like and never when they do!
This started when you countered an example of Jewish subversion with the achievements of Einstein. I'm explaining to you why that's a weak argument. Einstein certainly accelerated the development of theoretical physics, but many other people in his field were running in the same direction. Whereas in social sciences, for example, social Darwinism was the order of the day until Jewish thinkers like Boaz intervened and turned the bus around to cultural relativism, which undermines the orthodoxy of white, Christian, European countries.
The rest of your post is basically an argument from historical ignorance where you haven't read about investigations into Bolshevism, Marxism, etc. I would refer you to The role of Jews in the Russian Revolutionary movement by Leonard Schapiro, which plainly states on the first page that 50% of the revolutionary party membership was Jewish.
There are also contemporary writings from Churchill and other leaders that show they believed the Jews were leading the Bolsheviks. For example, he wrote the role of Jews in the revolution "is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others."
I believe there’s an interesting case to be made for a type of ancient communism which seems to have persisted through to the Classical era:
Biblical scholars have argued that the mode of production seen in early Hebrew society was a communitarian domestic one that was akin to primitive communism.[26][27]
The early Church Fathers, like their non-Abrahamic predecessors, maintained that human society had declined to its current state from a now lost egalitarian social order.[28] There are those who view that the early Christian Church, such as that one described in the Acts of the Apostles (specifically Acts 2:44–45 and Acts 4:32–45)[29][28][30] was an early form of communism.[31][32][33] The view is that communism was just Christianity in practice and Jesus Christ was himself a communist.[34] This link was highlighted in one of Marx's early writings which stated: "As Christ is the intermediary unto whom man unburdens all his divinity, all his religious bonds, so the state is the mediator unto which he transfers all his Godlessness, all his human liberty".[34] Furthermore, the Marxist ethos that aims for unity reflects the Christian universalist teaching that humankind is one and that there is only one god who does not discriminate among people.[35] Later historians have supported the reading of early church communities as communistic in structure.[36][37][38]
Pre-Marxist communism was also present in the attempts to establish communistic societies such as those made by the ancient Jewish sects the Essenes[39][40][41] and by the Judean desert sect.[clarification needed][42]
Guess who came up with General Relativity. You should boycott da Joooz by refusing to use GPS, which relies on it...
OK, let's break this down. Was Einstein the only guy in the history of the world that could've discovered general relativity? If so, him being Jewish is kind of irrelevant no?
If it's possible someone else would've discovered it, then how many gentiles were working in theoretical physics at the time? Quite a few. Is it possible one of them could've discovered it? Absolutely.
Now let's look at the other side. Did Jewish intellectuals found the concepts of cultural relativism, psychoanalysis, and Marxism? Yes. Did Jewish intellectuals advocate for mass migration into European nations? Yes. How many gentiles were thinking along these lines? Almost none.
Is it possible gentiles would have created these fictive ideas by themselves? Not really, no. The possibility is far greater that Jewish intellectualism was a necessary condition, not merely sufficient, for the formation of subversive concepts. These are all attacks from the outgroup on the ingroup.
Jewish individuals made up a majority of Bolshevik leadership. That would be over 2000% overrepresentation.
Well yeah. My point is not that it is relevant, it's that the Nazis only bring up Jewishness when it suits them. And they do it regardless of whether this could have been the only person in all of human history to come up with that idea.
Let's assume your framing. Were these the only people who could have come up with these ideas? Hardly seems likely.
Clever attempt, but you don't deal with how these ideas actually spread, and among whom. You can also not regard Marxism as emerging in a vacuum. It's the outgrowth of the French Revolution, as the whole idea of socialism itself was.
I'm not sure what you're basing this on.
It doesn't seem unlikely that people who are in an outgroup would come up with ideas that overturn established ideas. In case of the Bolsheviks, it's not at all surprising that the Jews would be with the people who were not staging pogroms. But you must admit that the people who post these things are not trying to make an intelligent, sophisticated argument like you are, but instead want to say "JEWS BAD". Which is why they bring it up when it's something they don't like and never when they do!
I doubt you're correct about this, but just to be sure: do you mean 'the Politburo', and if so, what year? Or as a whole? That is almost certainly incorrect.
This started when you countered an example of Jewish subversion with the achievements of Einstein. I'm explaining to you why that's a weak argument. Einstein certainly accelerated the development of theoretical physics, but many other people in his field were running in the same direction. Whereas in social sciences, for example, social Darwinism was the order of the day until Jewish thinkers like Boaz intervened and turned the bus around to cultural relativism, which undermines the orthodoxy of white, Christian, European countries.
The rest of your post is basically an argument from historical ignorance where you haven't read about investigations into Bolshevism, Marxism, etc. I would refer you to The role of Jews in the Russian Revolutionary movement by Leonard Schapiro, which plainly states on the first page that 50% of the revolutionary party membership was Jewish.
There are also contemporary writings from Churchill and other leaders that show they believed the Jews were leading the Bolsheviks. For example, he wrote the role of Jews in the revolution "is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others."
I believe there’s an interesting case to be made for a type of ancient communism which seems to have persisted through to the Classical era:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Marxist_communism#Classical_antiquity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primitive_communism#Example_societies