The issue is who is the arbiter for when there is clear enough evidence and when there isn't? It sounds good, but the unfortunate reality is such a policy would be weaponized disproportionately against people questioning the establishment.
In this case you literally have multiple videos of the event and can see him getting shot. Pretty clear what happened, only thing to really theorize on is the why, especially why the shooter had that opportunity.
To play devils advocate, we can see a bullet go by his head. (From that one photo) It appears like he was grazed by it but you can’t actually see it hit him and I haven’t seen any photos that show any damage to his ear.
The photos I’ve seen immediately after show some blood on his ear but I don’t see any damage. But old people ears look weird sometimes, hard to say for sure
The issue is who is the arbiter for when there is clear enough evidence and when there isn't? It sounds good, but the unfortunate reality is such a policy would be weaponized disproportionately against people questioning the establishment.
In this case you literally have multiple videos of the event and can see him getting shot. Pretty clear what happened, only thing to really theorize on is the why, especially why the shooter had that opportunity.
To play devils advocate, we can see a bullet go by his head. (From that one photo) It appears like he was grazed by it but you can’t actually see it hit him and I haven’t seen any photos that show any damage to his ear.
The photos I’ve seen immediately after show some blood on his ear but I don’t see any damage. But old people ears look weird sometimes, hard to say for sure
You know thinking about it, what I said is just the current policy used ONLY against us applied EQUALLY now that you said that.
Equality under the law is, sadly, dead. Today, every law has to be made with the people it is intended to be used against in mind.