What's the strawman here? That I think you're retarded and should be dismissed, or that you're trolling and should be dismissed? That's not a strawman. It's an ad hominem if anything. Except it wasn't in lieu of an argument, making it merely an insult, rather than a logical fallacy.
Everything you need is here within your own paragraph.
As for the rest; give me your address, bank account details and deepest, darkest secrets. I'm thinking of cooking up the storyline that nobody would ever believe was possible. Don't censor yourself here, just give it all freely and let the world know who you truly are.
If you don't give me your address, bank details and deepest darkest secrets then you clearly understand and know why some censorship is almost smart and useful. Either supply the deets or maybe understand when and why to shut the fuck up.
My privacy isn't censorship, you deranged fuckwit. Compelled speech, like you're trying to insist upon, is also immoral too.
Again, you have a fundamental misunderstanding of human rights. You have done nothing to change my opinion on that. And the fact that you think privacy is the same as exerting force against another to prevent their freedom of speech is honestly concerning. And I do mean concerning as in I'm starting to believe you need legitimate help.
This is the problem with statists. You simply don't understand the basic concept of freedom. A right is not something a person needs to exert at all times. That's why it's a freedom. It comes with the choice to exert that right if they so choose, and not from the choices of others like yourself. And statists love to use these weird threats (even in a hypothetical) to justify why their other immoral injustices are actually good. It's the grand old "comply so I don't have to hit you" tactic. I feel sorry for you, and I hope you get better.
inb4 "you didn't give your deets, therefore you know you're wrong", even though I addressed the point you poorly tried to make.
Yes, you're free to be an asshole. I know, it's such a shocking revelation that freedom involves the freedom to do things I personally don't like.
Just because you're a fragile little turd that wants to punish people that are mean doesn't mean others are. Some people have these things called principles that we stick by, even when it's not entirely comfortable or convenient. Must really suck being so strongly controlled by fleeting emotions.
Indeed. My principles have me assert that Alec Jones is an asshole and yours have Biden say Trump should have a bullseye over him and face no consequences.
Everything you need is here within your own paragraph.
As for the rest; give me your address, bank account details and deepest, darkest secrets. I'm thinking of cooking up the storyline that nobody would ever believe was possible. Don't censor yourself here, just give it all freely and let the world know who you truly are.
If you don't give me your address, bank details and deepest darkest secrets then you clearly understand and know why some censorship is almost smart and useful. Either supply the deets or maybe understand when and why to shut the fuck up.
My privacy isn't censorship, you deranged fuckwit. Compelled speech, like you're trying to insist upon, is also immoral too.
Again, you have a fundamental misunderstanding of human rights. You have done nothing to change my opinion on that. And the fact that you think privacy is the same as exerting force against another to prevent their freedom of speech is honestly concerning. And I do mean concerning as in I'm starting to believe you need legitimate help.
This is the problem with statists. You simply don't understand the basic concept of freedom. A right is not something a person needs to exert at all times. That's why it's a freedom. It comes with the choice to exert that right if they so choose, and not from the choices of others like yourself. And statists love to use these weird threats (even in a hypothetical) to justify why their other immoral injustices are actually good. It's the grand old "comply so I don't have to hit you" tactic. I feel sorry for you, and I hope you get better.
inb4 "you didn't give your deets, therefore you know you're wrong", even though I addressed the point you poorly tried to make.
Hey man, the only person reading these posts at this point are you and me.
If you are happy to accept that your mother is a whore because I said so then well done you.
Yay! Freedom of speech and no sense of boundaries.
Is she free later? And by free I mean no charge.
Unless that's sexist in which case she can pay me :)
Yes, you're free to be an asshole. I know, it's such a shocking revelation that freedom involves the freedom to do things I personally don't like.
Just because you're a fragile little turd that wants to punish people that are mean doesn't mean others are. Some people have these things called principles that we stick by, even when it's not entirely comfortable or convenient. Must really suck being so strongly controlled by fleeting emotions.
Indeed. My principles have me assert that Alec Jones is an asshole and yours have Biden say Trump should have a bullseye over him and face no consequences.
Are you annoyed that Thomas Crooks missed?