Indeed. My principles have me assert that Alec Jones is an asshole and yours have Biden say Trump should have a bullseye over him and face no consequences.
You really are that deeply wounded by words, aren't you? You tried to put a gotcha out there and it failed miserably. Now you're grasping at more straws to try and make me out to be the immoral one.
Biden's words are the least of my concerns with regards to whether or not he should be punished. The fact you're getting hung up on his words and not his actions is pretty funny. The man is a career politician with a bunch of suspicious ties going back half a century, but the real thing that crosses your line is best interpretation a poor choice of words in retrospect and worst interpretation was coded language (and my money is closer to the latter than the former, but that becomes complicity with arranging a hit, rather than an issue of speech, not that you'd understand basic nuance like that).
Though now you'll probably try and say that conspiracy (as in the act of conspiring) is ackchewallie just free speech and that's why we need censorship (but we can't call it censorship because it's the double plus good kind of censorship).
Are you annoyed that Thomas Crooks missed?
No. But it seems like you're happy he took the shot. Who cares that an innocent man is dead when you get to have a martyr that you can use to try and bludgeon people in a pithy internet argument. That's some really, really sad shit. And you're trying to take the high-ground regarding Jones? Really?
But you almost got close to understanding what I'm getting at with this:
That's some really, really sad shit. And you're trying to take the high-ground regarding Jones? Really?
So my free speech is some really, really sad shit. Would you go so far as to call it inappropriate? Punishable?
Mandatory self-censorship isn't required by those intelligent enough to have an opinion to share. Those who use inflamed rhetoric for personal gain aren't trying to be understood by the intelligent aspects of society and push base emotions to cause trouble. That trouble is and should be punishable but to hit Alec with a fine so far removed from reality is as stupid as everything he said at Sandy Hook. To further add scorn to an already embarrassing attempt at looking morally authoritative the entire January 6th fiasco only shows how weak a government is that wouldn't punish actual arsonists and looters with very clear instructions given to them on record by government representatives while throwing an older lady with a walker in jail for insurrection.
Words often lead to actions but it is the actions which are punishable. That still doesn't remove those who say the words from involvement.
So my free speech is some really, really sad shit. Would you go so far as to call it inappropriate? Punishable?
No. It's pathetic how you truly think that I want you punished. It's even worse that you seem to think me seeing you as pathetic could even be comparable to wanting you punished. What the hell is wrong with you? Are you so broken that you want people you disagree with to be punished?
Those who use inflamed rhetoric for personal gain aren't trying to be understood by the intelligent aspects of society and push base emotions to cause trouble.
You're unironically up your own ass so far you don't even realise how fucking stupid you sound. You really do believe yourself to be some big brained dipshit, don't you? An unironic midwit. Just pure mediocrity. Unironically shilling for the status quo.
You're unironically up your own ass so far you don't even realise how fucking stupid you sound. You really do believe yourself to be some big brained dipshit, don't you? An unironic midwit. Just pure mediocrity. Unironically shilling for the status quo.
How's that strawman doing?
Just because you agree with Biden calling Trump Hitler and praise Boeing for getting off scot-free on their murderous business practice don't feel you have to make any points worth reading. Your freedom to say stupid things out loudly is exactly what the freedom of speech is all about. Just don't be surprised when nobody wants to know what it is.
Indeed. My principles have me assert that Alec Jones is an asshole and yours have Biden say Trump should have a bullseye over him and face no consequences.
Are you annoyed that Thomas Crooks missed?
You really are that deeply wounded by words, aren't you? You tried to put a gotcha out there and it failed miserably. Now you're grasping at more straws to try and make me out to be the immoral one.
Biden's words are the least of my concerns with regards to whether or not he should be punished. The fact you're getting hung up on his words and not his actions is pretty funny. The man is a career politician with a bunch of suspicious ties going back half a century, but the real thing that crosses your line is best interpretation a poor choice of words in retrospect and worst interpretation was coded language (and my money is closer to the latter than the former, but that becomes complicity with arranging a hit, rather than an issue of speech, not that you'd understand basic nuance like that).
Though now you'll probably try and say that conspiracy (as in the act of conspiring) is ackchewallie just free speech and that's why we need censorship (but we can't call it censorship because it's the double plus good kind of censorship).
No. But it seems like you're happy he took the shot. Who cares that an innocent man is dead when you get to have a martyr that you can use to try and bludgeon people in a pithy internet argument. That's some really, really sad shit. And you're trying to take the high-ground regarding Jones? Really?
You sure use a lot of words to say nothing.
But you almost got close to understanding what I'm getting at with this:
So my free speech is some really, really sad shit. Would you go so far as to call it inappropriate? Punishable?
Mandatory self-censorship isn't required by those intelligent enough to have an opinion to share. Those who use inflamed rhetoric for personal gain aren't trying to be understood by the intelligent aspects of society and push base emotions to cause trouble. That trouble is and should be punishable but to hit Alec with a fine so far removed from reality is as stupid as everything he said at Sandy Hook. To further add scorn to an already embarrassing attempt at looking morally authoritative the entire January 6th fiasco only shows how weak a government is that wouldn't punish actual arsonists and looters with very clear instructions given to them on record by government representatives while throwing an older lady with a walker in jail for insurrection.
Words often lead to actions but it is the actions which are punishable. That still doesn't remove those who say the words from involvement.
No. It's pathetic how you truly think that I want you punished. It's even worse that you seem to think me seeing you as pathetic could even be comparable to wanting you punished. What the hell is wrong with you? Are you so broken that you want people you disagree with to be punished?
You're unironically up your own ass so far you don't even realise how fucking stupid you sound. You really do believe yourself to be some big brained dipshit, don't you? An unironic midwit. Just pure mediocrity. Unironically shilling for the status quo.
How's that strawman doing?
Just because you agree with Biden calling Trump Hitler and praise Boeing for getting off scot-free on their murderous business practice don't feel you have to make any points worth reading. Your freedom to say stupid things out loudly is exactly what the freedom of speech is all about. Just don't be surprised when nobody wants to know what it is.