I don't know maybe I'm wrong about this but they seem to want young men to take ED pills. And this seems off to me, shouldn't young people be able to achieve erections without medicinal aid? Are men not getting erections at younger ages?
Comments (20)
sorted by:
They're getting ED from all the porn they're consuming.
Also, clot shot reducing blood flow. Mix all that with constant bombardment of “men bad” from everywhere and you have a cocktail of dick death.
There's also all kinds of diet and environmental factors reducing testosterone.
As well as micro plastics flowing through almost every section of the human body now. There's an endless list of things that seemingly add up to a cohesive and coordinated effort to destroy men, and humanity at large.
fluoride, the medication the gov puts in your water 'for your own good'
I doubt ED is problem for men who consume enough porn to induce it. They usually end up in that situation because women's Chad chasing makes them unable to find a sexual partner to begin with, so they never end up in a situation where their ED would be an issue. The tranny problem is a particularly degenerate offshoot of this.
And the microplastics in their balls
While I'm sure we could talk at length about the societal rots that would lead to men needing it, its not a new thing really.
I think everyone here spent most of the prior few decades seeing "BIGGER DICKS" in every ad possible that could fit it. In fact, I think most of us could have that exact jingle from the Extenz Smiling Bob ads pulled from memory. That's how constant the bombardment was.
Its just the latest fad in preying on men's insecurity from Big Pharma.
This is also true. It's not much different from all the stereotypical email spam from the past 20 or so years.
Also, a big reason we've seen such a large resurgance is because some of the major ED meds went generic in the last 3-5 years (enough time has passed for the name brand patents to expire or whatever).
There has always been the spanish fly and the extender pills sold in cheap magazines. But that seems different from the actual medicine in Bluechew, of course that could just be me not connecting the dots
I'll stand by its just basic insecurity pandering, mixed with what the other guy said about them going generic which is interesting to learn.
Now we can probably get into why guys are so insecure about that, but that's a long list of stuff we already know a lot of the answers to.
yeah they used to play that ad on spike every break
Guys will beat off to porn four or five times a day and then Wonder why they have ED
The amount of gaslighting about the negative effects that soy has on testosterone is astounding. They also lie about the benefits that meat (especially red meat) has on testosterone levels.
There's also a lot of other variables that tend to fly under the radar too. While testosterone is certainly one major benefit of regular exercise and physical activity, improved blood flow, enhancing the cardiovascular systems (especially with regards to oxygen in-take), etc etc all improve just about... everything. For both men and women.
But then the left has thoroughly taken the narrative of discouraging physical fitness and activity to the point of outright gaslighting and lying.
It's been a sponser for a bunch of podcast for years. I've recently started seeing commercials for it and similar products. But the ads are filled wirh young women and young men. I remember when viagra was new their spokespeople were older dudes like Bob Dole.
Going generic does make it a lot more affordable to a lot more consumers, so maybe that's part of the reason they're broadening their target market.
Could also be a tweak to the advertising campaign, not specifically to target younger consumers so much as to give the impression that the drug will make middle aged guys (feel) "younger" and appeal more to young hot women.
It's not exactly a new kind of advertising strategy either. Cigarette and alcohol ads in magazines used to do similar things.
People saying porn addiction making it hard for guys to keep it up, but I think it's because people see porn and decide they want a 2 hour erection. Not doing that with a little blue pill.
I noticed in Australia the ED ads were targeting early 30's.
You shouldn't be needing Viagra until 60 at least