'Bishop' tries his hand at 'per capita'.
(i.imgur.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
I just wasted a whole bunch of time looking for that one person to point out that zero multiplied by ANYTHING is still zero.
And that was without having to go into the PER CAPITA thing or count out how many US presidents identified as black.
Unless I'm wrong and Barack Obama has 1 felony conviction (That I don't know about) or another president identified as black and as 1.
And THEN I'd go into the PER CAPITA thing.
X is where braincells go to die when there's no booze at the golf course country club due to pre-slavery abolition laws dictating what it morally correct in a value system world.
Arguing with people who never invented the zero about zero seems wrong.
Bill Clinton identified as the first black President. But still not convicted.
Also this is more like dividing by zero. Or dividing by numbers approaching zero. Which they're really not going to get. The closest thing I can tell people is it's like how if you've never batted, you don't have a 0 batting average. You have an undefined batting average.
I found one person in the entire Twitter thread.
What's it for? As far as I know it's zero.
Pretty sure Obama has 0 convictions, but that makes yet another part of the tweet a mistake.
If Obama has 1 felony conviction and Trump has 34, then Trump has 34 times more convictions of Obama. If Obama has 0 convictions, then "X times more convictions" is meaningless. You might as well say "Trump as eleventy billion times more convictions than Obama" since anything times 0 is 0.
Just another failure to math from him.
Yup, you understand the balance of the equals sign my friend :)
I think Axios found their new headline with that "eleventy billion".