Logically, yes. But logic has no place in that world of hatred and bigotry. When you normalize for hours worked and exact job classification, women are paid more hourly than men by a fairly notable amount. They also boast three times the favorable bias in courts compared to even the strongest racial bias gap. And there's several major, successful, and government-integrated movements that boil down to "believe, follow, and obey all women". Logically, this means they are disproportionately favored in money, power, and influence. But bring this up in a major way that threatens such an embedded institution and they will use said money, power, and influence to make your life a living hell, if you can live at all.

That begs the question of what is a 'disproportionate' amount of power and influence.

If blacks, troons, etc. get power on account of being black or troons, then that is wrong for that reason. (Also because troons should not be allowed to be lunatics in public, but that is a different matter.)

But imagine say blacks completely turning themselves around, working very hard, avoiding crime, etc. and as a result becoming so successful that they are overrepresented in powerful and influential positions. That may be disproportionate, but it is not unwarranted.

On the other hand, if incompetent blacks are given pilot jobs, or powerful/influential positions because of the color of their skin, then that is unwarranted, and therefore wrong.