No one worships capitalism. Quite the opposite in fact, given that the critics of it blatantly fetishize false idols.
The problem is that "capitalism" is a misnomer, used by people who would prefer the concept of the free exchange of goods and services be replaced for some variety or another of slavery.
Because what we have now is very, very far from the free exchange of goods and services. But the leftoids will rail against a system they created and imposed on us anyway, because some syphilitic old hobo from the 1800s told them it was a good buzzword to yell while trying to destroy civilization.
Yes "capitalism" is simply trade. That's why you can never actually get rid of it. You can only limit what is acceptable to trade or not. The most adherent "free market" ones would say you should be able to trade nuclear weapons, prostitution, slavery, etc.
The only difference is if it's the people able to participate in such trading, or if only the government is allowed to.
And here Mishima is just talking about the bastardization of language and loss of tradition, which has been going on in English for a long time now. If you check the Websters 1828 dictionary on some terms its like we are speaking two different languages.
Capitalism is literally nothing more than a Marxian anti-Jewish slur. "Someone who worships the accumulation of capital above all other thing." IE: "Someone who worships the jealous God of Israel."
No one has ever believed what Marx accused others of believing. He wanted people to: "Stop hoarding money", which is really: stop saving money and give it to resentment-mongering freaks like him so he can life life without responsibility to anyone or anything. The level of narcissism required to slander someone saving money for their own prosperity as stealing from you is beyond the pale.
Your hatred of Marx the demon is understandable but that is not anywhere close to a sane definition of capitalism. You are ceding to leftist manipulation when you use their absurd perversions of a term into an obviously ideologically charged opinion of capitalists, rather than an actual definition of capitalism.
It's his term. It's intentionally built in exactly the way it is for the purposes he intended. That's why I'm ceding the definition to him. It's a Leftist word defined by a Leftist.
It's the same reason I'm not going to seize the term "equitable redistribution" either. Nor am I going to use "praxis" or "white fragility". I'm going to accept their definitions, as originally defined ty the lunatics who made them, and condemn the entire word, definition, concept, context, and use.
No one worships capitalism. Quite the opposite in fact, given that the critics of it blatantly fetishize false idols.
The problem is that "capitalism" is a misnomer, used by people who would prefer the concept of the free exchange of goods and services be replaced for some variety or another of slavery.
Because what we have now is very, very far from the free exchange of goods and services. But the leftoids will rail against a system they created and imposed on us anyway, because some syphilitic old hobo from the 1800s told them it was a good buzzword to yell while trying to destroy civilization.
Yes "capitalism" is simply trade. That's why you can never actually get rid of it. You can only limit what is acceptable to trade or not. The most adherent "free market" ones would say you should be able to trade nuclear weapons, prostitution, slavery, etc.
The only difference is if it's the people able to participate in such trading, or if only the government is allowed to.
And here Mishima is just talking about the bastardization of language and loss of tradition, which has been going on in English for a long time now. If you check the Websters 1828 dictionary on some terms its like we are speaking two different languages.
I tried to look up 'nigger' and the text box turned red and redirected me to a suggestions page
You got me curious enough to look up the full text and it looks like it just hadn't been included yet.
That isn't the proper term, you have to look up negro for that.
Capitalism is literally nothing more than a Marxian anti-Jewish slur. "Someone who worships the accumulation of capital above all other thing." IE: "Someone who worships the jealous God of Israel."
No one has ever believed what Marx accused others of believing. He wanted people to: "Stop hoarding money", which is really: stop saving money and give it to resentment-mongering freaks like him so he can life life without responsibility to anyone or anything. The level of narcissism required to slander someone saving money for their own prosperity as stealing from you is beyond the pale.
Your hatred of Marx the demon is understandable but that is not anywhere close to a sane definition of capitalism. You are ceding to leftist manipulation when you use their absurd perversions of a term into an obviously ideologically charged opinion of capitalists, rather than an actual definition of capitalism.
It's his term. It's intentionally built in exactly the way it is for the purposes he intended. That's why I'm ceding the definition to him. It's a Leftist word defined by a Leftist.
It's the same reason I'm not going to seize the term "equitable redistribution" either. Nor am I going to use "praxis" or "white fragility". I'm going to accept their definitions, as originally defined ty the lunatics who made them, and condemn the entire word, definition, concept, context, and use.