So when they open a landfill in a predominantly white area, the residents leave, the property values drop, and "racialized communities" are drawn in by the cheaper housing, is the landfill retroactively racist?
That implies they're smart enough to do pattern recognition or self reflection.
By that time they'll be screaming about something else like how it's speciest to stop the wolves and bears entering cities now there's trash everywhere.
They're not going to do that. This is the definition of a NIMBY environmental policy. This policy is to protect the feelings 40 year old, childless, white women making over $65,000 a year.
The purpose is to prevent anyone from building any landfill or factory as a way of pushing de-growth and de-population.
Yeah i totally agree. I have seen this strategy in municipalities before, to use the environment just to keep anything from getting built, but I'm not sure I've ever seen it from a large country.
Globalists are basically looking at whole countries as irreducibly small political strata (like a township or district) and treating them with same level of homogeneity in policies.
It's like back in the 90's when people were saying that the US had "moved to a service sector economy". How could a country of 350 million people that's literally bigger than Europe be cloistered into a single-sector economy? It can't, but it can be reduced to that on a spreadsheet.
How could a country of 350 million people that's literally bigger than Europe be cloistered into a single-sector economy?
Oh well people did find a lot of jobs just effectively jerking each other off, like Starbucks. You know, I was re-watching Idiocracy, and I don't think I got the joke the first time.
So when they open a landfill in a predominantly white area, the residents leave, the property values drop, and "racialized communities" are drawn in by the cheaper housing, is the landfill retroactively racist?
That implies they're smart enough to do pattern recognition or self reflection.
By that time they'll be screaming about something else like how it's speciest to stop the wolves and bears entering cities now there's trash everywhere.
They're not going to do that. This is the definition of a NIMBY environmental policy. This policy is to protect the feelings 40 year old, childless, white women making over $65,000 a year.
The purpose is to prevent anyone from building any landfill or factory as a way of pushing de-growth and de-population.
Yeah i totally agree. I have seen this strategy in municipalities before, to use the environment just to keep anything from getting built, but I'm not sure I've ever seen it from a large country.
Globalists are basically looking at whole countries as irreducibly small political strata (like a township or district) and treating them with same level of homogeneity in policies.
It's like back in the 90's when people were saying that the US had "moved to a service sector economy". How could a country of 350 million people that's literally bigger than Europe be cloistered into a single-sector economy? It can't, but it can be reduced to that on a spreadsheet.
Oh well people did find a lot of jobs just effectively jerking each other off, like Starbucks. You know, I was re-watching Idiocracy, and I don't think I got the joke the first time.