Ron Paul: "We Spent a Billion Dollars Fighting the Houthis…and Lost'
(ronpaulinstitute.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (84)
sorted by:
I'm not sure I buy this. "I'm willing to die to fight the outlander" is not the same as "I don't care if I live or die." Particularly when the Yemenese Houthis seem to be achieving their goals.
Make no mistake, I don't care about what are essentially 21st century privateers (Iranian letter of marque, as it where), but a Navy's job is not to go fight the other guy's navy. Navies exist to protect commerce. Why is a US carrier group unable to do this in the Red Sea?
I'm sure about it. I've seen them strap bomb loaded backpacks onto little kids, and then tell them if they go hug the Americans that we'll give them candy.
You can never convince me that they care about their own lives.
Besides that, the answer to your question is simple. Their armament can reach shipping in the straights, with incredible cost effectiveness. Even if you invent some kind of high tech thingedy thing that can somehow snipe their rocket infantry before they fire, they don't care. All you've done is kill Omar and maybe destroy one rocket. They have a million more rockets and a million more Omars.
Turns out globalism isn't economically viable.
It's "if I die, I can be replaced" writ large.
"Who cares if I lose one kid? I can make five more."
Pretty much.
Fair enough. I guess the answer to my gripes it that modern tech require a "land war" when it come to control of the Red Sea.
That's why dependence on international shipping is so stupid.
At modern scale you might have a point, but international shipping has been a thing since the 15th century.
thats not "not caring about their own lives" though, thats them "not caring about someone else's kids' lives". and thats a scale the west isnt that far away from them on.
See, I wasn't making the distinction before, but since you have I'll entertain it.
It's worse.
Throwing away their children just for the chance if killing us, is far worse than just being suicidal. It's a level of savagery that makes even the noxiously amoral Chinese look good in comparison.
So I reiterate. You cannot convince me that their lives have even the smallest value, because they sure don't think they do either.
is sending them to instant death beter or worse than looking away while they get raped and tortured by some baboons you invited into the country to virtue signal?
i think both are subhuman behaviors, but at least one of them is honest about it
"to the shores of Tripoli" in the US Marine Corp anthem refers to the victory over Barbary pirates lol
I know. That was kind of my point. Surely an MEU and a naval support could hit Houthi ports and surrounding facilities then return to the carrier group? Its how we used to fight. Are the joint chiefs taking such exercise off the table?
Isn't the red sea maybe a little too shallow for a carrier to operate in?