The panel found “clear and convincing evidence” that Mr. Giuliani violated two Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct by making “baseless” claims of voter fraud in a federal lawsuit filed in November 2020. The lawsuit claimed that barriers for poll-watchers and “illegal” mail-in ballots were proof of“nationwide voter fraud.”
The report acknowledges that disbarment “has not been imposed in other frivolous litigation cases.” However, it claims that Mr. Giuliani’s efforts can’t be compared and that the “aggravating factors” involved here warrant severe disciplinary action.
Ah, the old "orange man bad" justification. Democracy doesn't work when those that control the levers of power abuse their position to persecute their political opponents.
If nothing else I'm offended by the random sprinkling of quotation marks in the first paragraph. "Illegal!" "Baseless!" No idea what they're implying or whom is quoting whom. Journalists deserve to suffer.
I'll let this speak for itself.
Ah, the old "orange man bad" justification. Democracy doesn't work when those that control the levers of power abuse their position to persecute their political opponents.
Is the brain rot so bad now that we actually have “orange man bad” logic incorporated into written law yet?
For people that hate 1940’s Germany so much, they sure do like to take from their playbook a lot
Democracy doesn't work, period. The US was NEVER supposed to be degraded to the point where every breathing zombie has a vote for sale.
If nothing else I'm offended by the random sprinkling of quotation marks in the first paragraph. "Illegal!" "Baseless!" No idea what they're implying or whom is quoting whom. Journalists deserve to suffer.
The article is from ZeroHedge.
#YesAllJournalists
You'd rather that they endorse the panel's claims that Giuliani's claims were baseless?