Nazis were literally just recolor variant commies. They all belong in the same woodchipper with the rest of the grubbling faggots who would be dictators. Sociopathy drives leftism, which is the great disease of the human mind.
Not even close to the same. That is a Facebook boomer talking point lol.
Communism revolves around ending private property ownership. National Socialism does not. This is such a major difference between ideologies that it alone disproves your claim.
Communism is based on egalitarianism DEI bullshit. Equity is it's only goal. National Socialism was based on natural hierarchies selecting the best of themselves. Quality was their aim.
Communism is inherently globalist. Free 'Capitalist' people with private property rights will always out perform communist slaves, undermining the utopia. True Communism requires the entire world to comply (be enslaved). National Socialism only required ONE nation to act in it's own interests, together.
There's a million more differences, but these 3 are huge. Although, I think you are just referring to centralized power being bad, and not actual ideology?
I get the concern. For example, I would never advocate for National Socialism in current day America. It's entire philosophy is based around a racially homogenous group of people protecting and cultivating its culture in accordance with the laws of nature (and communism is based on defying nature via equity). America is not racially homogenous.
Now, if I was a part of a racially homogenous group, I would absolutely be in favor of it. We are biologically wired to be National Socialists with our tribe. It's the same behavior we already have towards our families, just on a larger scale. Everyone is related in a racially homogenous nation at the end of the day, so you are just working as a larger family unit, instead of as individuals performing commerce in a global jewry economic zone (i.e. USA)
It might be better and have a lower kill count, but you're wrong on many points.
Communism revolves around ending private property ownership. National Socialism does not. This is such a major difference between ideologies that it alone disproves your claim.
It is still fundamentally a form of socialism and it comes right up the the line on private ownership. It's still your factory, in theory, but here's a party member to dictate how 90% of it gets run, and who you can employ. It's partially yours, on paper. Better? Sure, but not by that much.
Communism is based on egalitarianism DEI bullshit. Equity is it's only goal. National Socialism was based on natural hierarchies selecting the best of themselves. Quality was their aim.
No, it sought to eliminate class hierarchies (it is, after all, a socialism) and it wasn't exactly trad in regards to sex and the workplace (sex is more complex, because they also highly promoted and paid for motherhood due to their other concerns). It's not all hierarchies, sure, but it is not as free of proto DEI stuff as you might think.
National Socialism only required ONE nation to act in it's own interests, together.
A significant part of the nazi belief was a socialist and sort of Malthusian understanding of the world's economics. They needed lebensraum. Not for any particular resource, or just space for hypothetical larger future generations, but because their economic theories said the world and economy was doomed and they needed more if the German people were to not starve.
It was all for the benefit of one nation yes, but it needed the space of all others.
communists are worse than nazis in every. possible. way.
Nazis were literally just recolor variant commies. They all belong in the same woodchipper with the rest of the grubbling faggots who would be dictators. Sociopathy drives leftism, which is the great disease of the human mind.
Not even close to the same. That is a Facebook boomer talking point lol.
Communism revolves around ending private property ownership. National Socialism does not. This is such a major difference between ideologies that it alone disproves your claim.
Communism is based on egalitarianism DEI bullshit. Equity is it's only goal. National Socialism was based on natural hierarchies selecting the best of themselves. Quality was their aim.
Communism is inherently globalist. Free 'Capitalist' people with private property rights will always out perform communist slaves, undermining the utopia. True Communism requires the entire world to comply (be enslaved). National Socialism only required ONE nation to act in it's own interests, together.
There's a million more differences, but these 3 are huge. Although, I think you are just referring to centralized power being bad, and not actual ideology?
I get the concern. For example, I would never advocate for National Socialism in current day America. It's entire philosophy is based around a racially homogenous group of people protecting and cultivating its culture in accordance with the laws of nature (and communism is based on defying nature via equity). America is not racially homogenous.
Now, if I was a part of a racially homogenous group, I would absolutely be in favor of it. We are biologically wired to be National Socialists with our tribe. It's the same behavior we already have towards our families, just on a larger scale. Everyone is related in a racially homogenous nation at the end of the day, so you are just working as a larger family unit, instead of as individuals performing commerce in a global jewry economic zone (i.e. USA)
It might be better and have a lower kill count, but you're wrong on many points.
It is still fundamentally a form of socialism and it comes right up the the line on private ownership. It's still your factory, in theory, but here's a party member to dictate how 90% of it gets run, and who you can employ. It's partially yours, on paper. Better? Sure, but not by that much.
No, it sought to eliminate class hierarchies (it is, after all, a socialism) and it wasn't exactly trad in regards to sex and the workplace (sex is more complex, because they also highly promoted and paid for motherhood due to their other concerns). It's not all hierarchies, sure, but it is not as free of proto DEI stuff as you might think.
A significant part of the nazi belief was a socialist and sort of Malthusian understanding of the world's economics. They needed lebensraum. Not for any particular resource, or just space for hypothetical larger future generations, but because their economic theories said the world and economy was doomed and they needed more if the German people were to not starve.
It was all for the benefit of one nation yes, but it needed the space of all others.