Nac Soc had a cult mentality where everything was devoted to the Fuhrer and the state. (Fascism obviously.) You see this in how Hannah Reitsch spoke about Hitler, for instance. This totalizes everything, including religious belief, which I couldn't accept.
It might be better and have a lower kill count, but you're wrong on many points.
Communism revolves around ending private property ownership. National Socialism does not. This is such a major difference between ideologies that it alone disproves your claim.
It is still fundamentally a form of socialism and it comes right up the the line on private ownership. It's still your factory, in theory, but here's a party member to dictate how 90% of it gets run, and who you can employ. It's partially yours, on paper. Better? Sure, but not by that much.
Communism is based on egalitarianism DEI bullshit. Equity is it's only goal. National Socialism was based on natural hierarchies selecting the best of themselves. Quality was their aim.
No, it sought to eliminate class hierarchies (it is, after all, a socialism) and it wasn't exactly trad in regards to sex and the workplace (sex is more complex, because they also highly promoted and paid for motherhood due to their other concerns). It's not all hierarchies, sure, but it is not as free of proto DEI stuff as you might think.
National Socialism only required ONE nation to act in it's own interests, together.
A significant part of the nazi belief was a socialist and sort of Malthusian understanding of the world's economics. They needed lebensraum. Not for any particular resource, or just space for hypothetical larger future generations, but because their economic theories said the world and economy was doomed and they needed more if the German people were to not starve.
It was all for the benefit of one nation yes, but it needed the space of all others.
Communism revolves around ending private property ownership. National Socialism does not. This is such a major difference between ideologies that it alone disproves your claim.
They were both command economies though. Just because one believed that the upper class was to be dismantled, and the other believed that the state should be unified with its people was different, both governments exercised complete control over their economy in the same way.
Communism is about power, and manipulating masses to gain that power with oppressor / oppressed dogmatic propaganda. DEI is a modern contrivance that communism predates. Your understanding of the trappings of a modern form of the ideology misses the forest for the trees.
Relative cultural trappings do not define an ideology. Structures and effects do.
You should be able to distinguish between slogans and reality.
Quality was their aim.
That's why they invited Albert Einstein to come back to Germany?
National Socialism only required ONE nation to act in it's own interests, together.
And then invade very other country...
We are biologically wired to be National Socialists with our tribe.
If that is the case, why did it take 251,933 years of human history before the first national socialist showed up? No doubt you might make analogies between national socialism and things that came before. But I bet there will be pretty major differences between the NSs of the 1930s and those your retrospectively baptize as such.
It's the same behavior we already have towards our families, just on a larger scale
Don't some conservatives say that they are communists within their own family, but that this is exactly why it does not work on a larger scale?
Nac Soc had a cult mentality where everything was devoted to the Fuhrer and the state. (Fascism obviously.) You see this in how Hannah Reitsch spoke about Hitler, for instance. This totalizes everything, including religious belief, which I couldn't accept.
It might be better and have a lower kill count, but you're wrong on many points.
It is still fundamentally a form of socialism and it comes right up the the line on private ownership. It's still your factory, in theory, but here's a party member to dictate how 90% of it gets run, and who you can employ. It's partially yours, on paper. Better? Sure, but not by that much.
No, it sought to eliminate class hierarchies (it is, after all, a socialism) and it wasn't exactly trad in regards to sex and the workplace (sex is more complex, because they also highly promoted and paid for motherhood due to their other concerns). It's not all hierarchies, sure, but it is not as free of proto DEI stuff as you might think.
A significant part of the nazi belief was a socialist and sort of Malthusian understanding of the world's economics. They needed lebensraum. Not for any particular resource, or just space for hypothetical larger future generations, but because their economic theories said the world and economy was doomed and they needed more if the German people were to not starve.
It was all for the benefit of one nation yes, but it needed the space of all others.
They were both command economies though. Just because one believed that the upper class was to be dismantled, and the other believed that the state should be unified with its people was different, both governments exercised complete control over their economy in the same way.
Communism is about power, and manipulating masses to gain that power with oppressor / oppressed dogmatic propaganda. DEI is a modern contrivance that communism predates. Your understanding of the trappings of a modern form of the ideology misses the forest for the trees.
Relative cultural trappings do not define an ideology. Structures and effects do.
You should be able to distinguish between slogans and reality.
That's why they invited Albert Einstein to come back to Germany?
And then invade very other country...
If that is the case, why did it take 251,933 years of human history before the first national socialist showed up? No doubt you might make analogies between national socialism and things that came before. But I bet there will be pretty major differences between the NSs of the 1930s and those your retrospectively baptize as such.
Don't some conservatives say that they are communists within their own family, but that this is exactly why it does not work on a larger scale?