Funny how the "media literacy" crowd insists KLK is some kind of own towards fanservice in anime. They are irony poisoned retards who are unable to grasp how someone can be earnest through metaphors and symbolism.
The point of the show is Ryuuko integrating and weaponizing her sexuality, not pointing out bikini armor is not practical...
They are also the type of people who think if one series "subverts" something or parodies it, then that thing can no longer ever be used across the genre because its been destroyed.
Because as we know, once Evangelion mocked the concept of child soldier mecha pilots, Gundam was cancelled forever.
This is an insightful comment. Their subversions become status quo, to the point where a traditional product almost feels subversive.
Imagine a Star Wars movie in 2024 that features a straight white male protagonist who isn’t a morally gray anti-hero, isn’t surrounded by more competent female characters, and isn’t a spy-infused beta male weakling. The mainstream press would lose their minds over such a thing because it would be legitimately transgressive in this climate.
The mainstream press would lose their minds over such a thing because it would be legitimately transgressive in this climate.
Not just the mainstream press, also the normies.
I learned this when discussing the Mario movie on some normie YouTube channels and was disgusted to find so many normies hating on classic Mario games because they said they hated how "Peach was a damsel in distress" and they kept praising the movie for making her a boss babe. Even though in real life practically every woman is a damsel in distress who either needs a man to help her through life or the government because most can't take care of themselves or survive on their own. Yet now a basic biological fact is considered "sexist".
Funny how the "media literacy" crowd insists KLK is some kind of own towards fanservice in anime. They are irony poisoned retards who are unable to grasp how someone can be earnest through metaphors and symbolism. The point of the show is Ryuuko integrating and weaponizing her sexuality, not pointing out bikini armor is not practical...
They are also the type of people who think if one series "subverts" something or parodies it, then that thing can no longer ever be used across the genre because its been destroyed.
Because as we know, once Evangelion mocked the concept of child soldier mecha pilots, Gundam was cancelled forever.
This is an insightful comment. Their subversions become status quo, to the point where a traditional product almost feels subversive.
Imagine a Star Wars movie in 2024 that features a straight white male protagonist who isn’t a morally gray anti-hero, isn’t surrounded by more competent female characters, and isn’t a spy-infused beta male weakling. The mainstream press would lose their minds over such a thing because it would be legitimately transgressive in this climate.
Not just the mainstream press, also the normies.
I learned this when discussing the Mario movie on some normie YouTube channels and was disgusted to find so many normies hating on classic Mario games because they said they hated how "Peach was a damsel in distress" and they kept praising the movie for making her a boss babe. Even though in real life practically every woman is a damsel in distress who either needs a man to help her through life or the government because most can't take care of themselves or survive on their own. Yet now a basic biological fact is considered "sexist".
The left uses words like magic spells. Every "-ist" or "-aphobe" is just their way of conditioning people to deny reality.