This isn't the first, second, third, or fourth time we've been overrun by retards.
This shit is much more damaging to a community than any of what Dom lashes out against could ever be.
He claims to care about keeping this community healthy, but continually let's shit like this happen, while simultaneously over-moderating legitimate users. While also not listening to the users, the majority of which think his rules are bullshit and counterproductive.
Reminder that he recently said that this comic is "pushing race war" and...
What is the message of this comic? Pretty straight-forward: In the inter-temporal race war of jews against all civilization, the republican party exists to serve jews and jews alone.
He also says people here want to murder him and his family.
He's also said comparing cops reactions to BLM to reactions to anti-Israel protests is "Asserting hypnotic control of the police to foment an international race war."
It would be one (still bad) thing if he was spinning out, but was at least doing his job in moderating other things. But he's not. Again, he claims to want to keep things healthy here. Are things healthy here, with how he does (or worse, does not do) things?
I've defended him in the past, too. I'm not one of his die-hard haters. He's good on many issues, and I appreciate his hands-off approach when it comes to many issues. But there are issues he weighs in on that he shouldn't, and issues he needs to weigh in on that he doesn't, at least in a timely manner.
He's lost the fucking plot, and is pretty much tanking this community which would otherwise be completely functional. He's the biggest danger to this community at this point.
Criticizing me has nothing to do with that. Race War & Genocide is merely a repeating of the meta-narrative of someone who is ideologically captured.
He was critiquing you and your modding. You read everything else into it.
Buzzwords and mindreading are a sign of ideological capture. You're captured, you're off in your own fictional reality.
Let's go through what was said, in the example I'm thinking of, where you went on to accuse him of wanting to kill you. It's also worth pointing out you didn't get a single upvote, and 21 downvotes, while everyone who called out your absurd claims got all upvotes. And, no, I'm not saying that proves anyone right or wrong, just pointing out that no one thinks you were being sensible, and that does count for something. No one was seeing things your way, when you still think you're clearly correct. Not a single person sees your reality, at least in that instance.
This is largely simply a true statement.
An exaggeration as, to your credit, you don't throw down a lot of permas. But you do have a specific focus on going after people who talk bad about Jews, and that's where most of your mindreading occurs. I know you'll disagree, but you tend to reach farther to determine guilt in those instances. And you went on to ban a few people for completely innocent things that you took the very most wrong way.
You can agree or disagree with that guy, but accusing him of wanting to murder you and everyone you know is a serious fucking reach, which is why people rightfully objected so strongly to that nonsense.
Your response:
Firstly, he never asserted any of that, that's more mindreading from you. Now, on to the points.
You exaggerate and make it as absurd as possible to try to make people look insane. International? Absolutely. Thus the term globalist. "Inter-temporal?" Yes, it's been going on for quite some time. Racial? There are certainly elements, let's just put it that way. As to using "Jedeo-Capitalism" to break down civilization, firstly, that's your term. There are certainly examples of trying to use bastardized "capitalism" to break down civilization, some very explicit, others more subtle. Marx being a famous one, who just came out and said it. Klaus Schwab and the whole WEF are another example, although aren't quite as blatant in their stated goals.
That's just absurd, and everyone but you knows it.
Look, I don't want to fight with you, I really don't. You're of course welcome to hold whatever opinions you like, too. I just wish you'd moderate in a level and unbiased way (and, again, to your credit, you do on almost all topics), and cut it out with the mindreading. Moderate people for what they're actually saying and doing, not what you perceive their motivation behind something is. Thought crime is no way to run this ship.