"Woman-identifying person"...are these clowns fucking serious?
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
"It's literally the plot of every other thriller novel..." But surely that's not the agenda-pushing, propaganda-laced problem; brainwashing women to think 50% of the human population is more dangerous than a wild apex predator in its home territory. No, it must be men.
This is the entire point of the bear/man question. Obviously, in 99.99% of circumstances you would pick man - the only case in which you wouldn't is if you knew the man was going to eat you while you were still alive, y'know, like bears do. But their brains are so rotted out with trash media that they seriously think that "bear" would ever be preferable.
We did too good a job protecting them boys, now they don't even understand reality.
As an aside, what exactly is the horror of rape these days? Abortions are easily accessible and STDs are either curable or treatable, so what's the big downside? How is it worse that a comparable assault? Considering the total lack of long term consequences, I would argue getting a tooth punched out is worse than rape, assuming access to Western healthcare.
That was my argument also, but my comment didn’t post…
Rape is objectively not as bad as being eaten alive/dismembered/disemboweled, which should be obvious, but somehow isn’t, to these idiots…
At least with rape you’re likely to still be fucking alive, at the end of it. At least relative to the bear situation…
Being alive is always the superior option, because while alive, you always have the option to be dead, but once dead, you do not have the option of being alive. If being dead is superior, then everyone who is alive with that decision can choose to be dead.