What Hitting The Wall Looks Like For Rihanna, No AI Was Used
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
In this image, she has been deliberately made up to be ugly - deliberately conflating sexuality with disgust, part of the queer agenda. That in itself is worthy of discussion, but your obsession with online gender wars forced you to declare that a woman with two children has hit "the wall". Anybody looking at this site from the outside could screenshot this post, declare it to be an incel forum and it would be impossible to argue otherwise.
I'm not seeing where you claim he's wrong, or why it has to be his "obsession with online gender wars" instead of just a plain observation or opinion anyone could make. I can't even begin to understand the psychology of people who use "incel" though, so I wouldn't worry too much about what they might think of this forum.
He's wrong because it's: not a candid photo, not intended to be appealing, and doesn't really show any severe signs of aging (if you look past the garish makeup). To pull out "the wall" in response to this image is an indicator of what's on your mind, not what's in the image.
The 'incel' predicate is obsessively used by the 'journalistic' profession. It means nothing when coming from pseudo-intellectuals, screeching harpies and male feminists.
Nothing about what they're doing conforms to the ethical standards of what 'journalism' is supposed to be. When a journalist uses the term 'racist', it automatically means they're slandering and profaning someone, same with incel, bigot, misogynist, antisemite, homophobe and the laughable 'transphobic'.