Nitter: https://nitter.poast.org/TM1Politics/status/1785309707441185078
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TM1Politics/status/1785309707441185078
Archive:
And the punishment update:
Nitter: https://nitter.poast.org/TM1Politics/status/1785355046890148084
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TM1Politics/status/1785355046890148084
archive:
You opened the door to this current predicament by creating privileges based on physical characteristics formalised into law.
Only way women don't become the next targets is to destroy that completely. But I doubt enough of them will come to that realisation in time.
devil's advocate: the girls who were banned didn't, they're too young to have participated in that movement. they're reaping the consequences of their predecessors.
Unfortunately yes but we need THEM to know that.
Driving a wedge between generations of women might be to the benefit of society to kill the generational creation of feminists.
Fair. so if I were part of the conversation, I would do my best to let them know that the crappy situation they're in is not their fault. framing it otherwise would create uneeded melodrama.
It won't work. The Women are Wonderful effect (ingroup bias) for women is stronger than any dose of reality.
Most women would literally rather die than be a 'gender traitor'.
Give them a few years and eventually they’ll be in state college bitching about how the patriarchy failed them
maybe, but I'm not one to punish those for crimes they haven't committed.
women are women's worse enemy. women will most likely destroy other women because of vain, physical reasons (aka, she is younger or prettier).
men will most likely destroy other men because of disrespect or for money/power.