Rhetorical question
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (86)
sorted by:
If I had to guess, it's to promote themselves to a separate special class,above everybody else.
Racism is bad, but antisemitism is super duper extra bad.
Genocide is bad, but the Holocaust was super duper extra bad.
Whatever the topic, having a separate term allows them to make the topic about them. It's narcissism.
The craziest part about the word Holocaust is that the only time it shows up in the Bible it’s to refer to a “burnt offering” of charred flesh and fat offered to YHWH in Genesis.
The Jews have a really fucked up view of God and prophecy. From what I've read, they literally believe that 6,000,000 Jews had to be burnt in a fire to return to the promised land, and apparently they believed they could force the issue.
As a Christian, I'm always skeptical of people who insist that prophecy always has to be taken 100% literally. As though God doesn't love His metaphors and parables when explaining things to us. People who think they can force His hand by playing Magic Spells: Gargoyles Edition are even shadier.
yeah, if God is perfect, then God knows perfectly how to use abstract ideas and nuance. a lot of Christianity in general depends so much on this fact, it's really a shame most either ignore it or completely twist the intended interpretation.
That's literally what makes them j*wish. In Christ, God revealed that a huge chunk of his eternal strategy was a word game to distract the Enemy. The judeans who accepted God's revealed explanation became Christians. The judeans who replied "nuh uh" are the cursed people we suffer under today.