I found this on Reddit, any thoughts from the Warhammer heads(?)?
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (66)
sorted by:
being for everyone means it's for no one because there's nothing unique or exciting about it.
Similarly, infinite genders mean gender is absolutely meaningless, and a retarded stand-in - not to mention facsimile - for personality.
It's always cracked me up how they demand 'respect my pronouns' and other nonsense, while devaluing the whole concept of sex or gender. If you're saying everyone can have their own "gender identity," your pronouns are all "you."
It's all nonsense. "Gender affirming" surgery implies that getting a dick makes you the male gender. And removing it makes you the female gender. So then they acknowledge that gender = specific genitals. And they also acknowledge that gender = sex. It's wrong to assume someone's gender. Apparently we shouldn't have any way of knowing, yet they do shit like body mutilating, hormones therapy, chest binders to trick people into thinking they are something other than what they are, ie they WANT people to assume their gender based on their appearance.
Its because it all extends out from the gays and their community, wherein a person is defined by their "top or bottom" status to a point where its basically used as a standin for being the man or women in the relationship. Even their subgenres of gays are defined along lines of how manly/womanly it makes you (with bears and twinks being the hard masculine or feminine appearances).
At least there, because its all dicks, they were forced to attach the status to other non-primary sources of sexual demonstration. But in the absence of that, you can just narrow it down.
trans and non binary are ideologies that shouldn't mix, cause they are complete opposites, but here we are...