These things are not in conflict. What a strange accusation.
To be fair, they didn't say or imply it was in conflict, just that you being against censorship is because you're racist. It's a dirty smear tactic, but they weren't implying hypocrisy, just duplicity. Which I still resent because, like you, I am legitimately anti-censorship. Anything else is beside the point. I don't like censorship, which is why I'm against censorship. There's no secret agenda, and them calling me racist is just ad hominem nonsense.
Muh man.
To be fair, they didn't say or imply it was in conflict, just that you being against censorship is because you're racist. It's a dirty smear tactic, but they weren't implying hypocrisy, just duplicity. Which I still resent because, like you, I am legitimately anti-censorship. Anything else is beside the point. I don't like censorship, which is why I'm against censorship. There's no secret agenda, and them calling me racist is just ad hominem nonsense.
Just making the case for racism being a moral good if that's what they're suggesting honestly.
I mean, their argument is too retarded to give any level of logic to.
They're wrong and stupid, so whether or not racism is a moral good is completely separate from their stupidity.
‘Ol reliable just slap and -ism in there and suddenly you have a valid argument.
It’s so stupid that this works but if you wanna see it happen in real time go to a politics Reddit and watch the mental gymnastics unfold.