These things are not in conflict. What a strange accusation.
To be fair, they didn't say or imply it was in conflict, just that you being against censorship is because you're racist. It's a dirty smear tactic, but they weren't implying hypocrisy, just duplicity. Which I still resent because, like you, I am legitimately anti-censorship. Anything else is beside the point. I don't like censorship, which is why I'm against censorship. There's no secret agenda, and them calling me racist is just ad hominem nonsense.
I am both racist and against censorship.
These things are not in conflict. What a strange accusation.
Muh man.
To be fair, they didn't say or imply it was in conflict, just that you being against censorship is because you're racist. It's a dirty smear tactic, but they weren't implying hypocrisy, just duplicity. Which I still resent because, like you, I am legitimately anti-censorship. Anything else is beside the point. I don't like censorship, which is why I'm against censorship. There's no secret agenda, and them calling me racist is just ad hominem nonsense.
Just making the case for racism being a moral good if that's what they're suggesting honestly.
I mean, their argument is too retarded to give any level of logic to.
They're wrong and stupid, so whether or not racism is a moral good is completely separate from their stupidity.
‘Ol reliable just slap and -ism in there and suddenly you have a valid argument.
It’s so stupid that this works but if you wanna see it happen in real time go to a politics Reddit and watch the mental gymnastics unfold.