What are they implying here about red pillers and charging money for Twitter, with relation to the poll? Anyone know?
In any case, it seems logical that right leaning women are less likely to use social media, which means they're less likely to vote in an online poll. However, it's been widely known for a while now that women majority vote left, with the one exception being married White women.
This bitch is farming for engagement too, she wants replies that say "This is how you fucking retards have been voting forever".
There's a reason the non-anonymous internet fills people with rage. They see faces they recognize and want to interact with them as normal people but to do so is to be suckered into transitively paying them money. When you realize that you've been made into a game to minmax income you start to feel a certain ways.
What are they implying here about red pillers and charging money for Twitter, with relation to the poll? Anyone know?
In any case, it seems logical that right leaning women are less likely to use social media, which means they're less likely to vote in an online poll. However, it's been widely known for a while now that women majority vote left, with the one exception being married White women.
Apparently they think red pillers are paid by twitter or at least make money from their twitter activity.
Not sure what you're seeing that it was an online poll. The poll was by the New York Times.
I mean, red pill influencers do make some money from twitter if they're premium
This bitch is farming for engagement too, she wants replies that say "This is how you fucking retards have been voting forever".
There's a reason the non-anonymous internet fills people with rage. They see faces they recognize and want to interact with them as normal people but to do so is to be suckered into transitively paying them money. When you realize that you've been made into a game to minmax income you start to feel a certain ways.
Ah, OK. So there's that part.