I hate to sound like an Extremistâ„¢, but women and trannies seem to statistically make incredibly poor leaders, and should probably not be allowed any power whatsoever. Keep these weirdos away from the levers of power.
Also, check out Razorfist for more info on these things, including his livestream with Pardoe (Iron Age Attacks #1.) It's a good stream overall, with plenty of fun stuff outside of BattleTech too.
Even as bad as things are I still try not to go down that path myself but I honestly don't blame you for feeling that way at all. If there was just a massive backlash by men against women in the next century I would probably shrug just like with the tranny bullshit because it's all so damn predictable.
Women could have gotten away with a lot of shit, but they should never have made the mistake of invading men's hobbies. That's how we find our peace.
Even as bad as things are I still try not to go down that path myself...
Why not, though? Experience, reality, and statistics seemingly bear it out.
Think about it. In any moderated online space (YT, Twitch, Discord, Steam, what have you) who have you had more problems with...professed (it is the internet after all, and you can't tell) men, or women? Professed female moderators seem to always be sperging out, going on power trips, and acted entitled and demanding attention. Not saying 100% of them are bad but, holy shit, they perform much worse on average than male moderators, it seems.
...but I honestly don't blame you for feeling that way at all. If there was just a massive backlash by men against women in the next century I would probably shrug just like with the tranny bullshit because it's all so damn predictable.
I'm not calling for that sort of backlash. I don't hate women. I just recognize their (again, statistical, and some can overcome) failings. Women don't make good leaders. They're not equipped for it, and use the power to follow through with their grudges and biases.
Women could have gotten away with a lot of shit, but they should never have made the mistake of invading men's hobbies. That's how we find our peace.
It's kind of funny you accuse (and that's a stronger word than what I mean, but I can't think of a better one) of singling out women, when that's not exactly what I'm saying. I don't necessarily think "women" invaded men's hobbies. That's definitely part of it, but there's a bunch more to it. Culture as a whole has been turned against us, and women are one of the groups used to invade our holy hobbies. So I suppose it's technically true that women are invading men's hobbies, but that's a massive oversimplification.
Even though I mock the boomers and tradcucks for suggesting this, there is something to be said for how skanks are overrepresented on social media and causing endless drama. These stereotypes exist for a reason and yes statistically you're right but at the same time I'm not going to be a dick and chase away the few good women out there that can behave themselves and act like adults.
I've spoken to relatively normal women before even if I've had my disagreements with them and let's be real, those women are usually in relationships and are generally quite stable which is why you simply don't often hear from them unless you happen to know them personally or chat with them generally. Normal people don't get bumped up on the search algorithms, drama filled lolcows do.
Granted, I am simplifying the whole thing by saying it's 'women' because yes it's feminist women especially with an extreme ideological bent. Really though that's where it all went fucking wrong, as men we've been far too nice and these types of women who do these things have taken full advantage of it and proved themselves to be utter psychopaths. Yes there's more going on here, these women were weaponised by glowies and political commissars, but at the end of the day they made the choice to go along with these people for their own benefit. Which basically meant ultimately invading the industry, getting free money and destroying everything.
These stereotypes exist for a reason and yes statistically you're right but at the same time I'm not going to be a dick and chase away the few good women out there that can behave themselves and act like adults.
In the end the statistics probably know better than you or I TBH. It's not just the obviously unstable ones who are unsuited to the level-headed impartiality of good leadership and it'd be far too arrogant to pretend we can tell at a glance which otherwise normal women lack the mental fortitude not to crack under the pressure. For every superficially normal woman who might qualify for a leadership role there's almost certainly an equally qualified man within arms reach who is far more likely to deliver lasting positive results.
There are far fewer leadership positions than there are potentially good leaders and in the quest to not be a dick to the few good women, you'll instead end up being a dick to the even better male leaders that would need to have their potential suppressed to pander to those women. Not only that but by abetting them you also play a part in everyone under them having to suffer the fallout if inferior leadership fucks up things for everyone or any petty games of favourites that may develop.
There's plenty of good men out there in need of a chance, you should never need to gamble on the B-list candidates.
I hate to sound like an Extremistâ„¢, but women and trannies seem to statistically make incredibly poor leaders, and should probably not be allowed any power whatsoever. Keep these weirdos away from the levers of power.
Also, check out Razorfist for more info on these things, including his livestream with Pardoe (Iron Age Attacks #1.) It's a good stream overall, with plenty of fun stuff outside of BattleTech too.
Even as bad as things are I still try not to go down that path myself but I honestly don't blame you for feeling that way at all. If there was just a massive backlash by men against women in the next century I would probably shrug just like with the tranny bullshit because it's all so damn predictable.
Women could have gotten away with a lot of shit, but they should never have made the mistake of invading men's hobbies. That's how we find our peace.
Why not, though? Experience, reality, and statistics seemingly bear it out.
Think about it. In any moderated online space (YT, Twitch, Discord, Steam, what have you) who have you had more problems with...professed (it is the internet after all, and you can't tell) men, or women? Professed female moderators seem to always be sperging out, going on power trips, and acted entitled and demanding attention. Not saying 100% of them are bad but, holy shit, they perform much worse on average than male moderators, it seems.
I'm not calling for that sort of backlash. I don't hate women. I just recognize their (again, statistical, and some can overcome) failings. Women don't make good leaders. They're not equipped for it, and use the power to follow through with their grudges and biases.
It's kind of funny you accuse (and that's a stronger word than what I mean, but I can't think of a better one) of singling out women, when that's not exactly what I'm saying. I don't necessarily think "women" invaded men's hobbies. That's definitely part of it, but there's a bunch more to it. Culture as a whole has been turned against us, and women are one of the groups used to invade our holy hobbies. So I suppose it's technically true that women are invading men's hobbies, but that's a massive oversimplification.
Even though I mock the boomers and tradcucks for suggesting this, there is something to be said for how skanks are overrepresented on social media and causing endless drama. These stereotypes exist for a reason and yes statistically you're right but at the same time I'm not going to be a dick and chase away the few good women out there that can behave themselves and act like adults.
I've spoken to relatively normal women before even if I've had my disagreements with them and let's be real, those women are usually in relationships and are generally quite stable which is why you simply don't often hear from them unless you happen to know them personally or chat with them generally. Normal people don't get bumped up on the search algorithms, drama filled lolcows do.
Granted, I am simplifying the whole thing by saying it's 'women' because yes it's feminist women especially with an extreme ideological bent. Really though that's where it all went fucking wrong, as men we've been far too nice and these types of women who do these things have taken full advantage of it and proved themselves to be utter psychopaths. Yes there's more going on here, these women were weaponised by glowies and political commissars, but at the end of the day they made the choice to go along with these people for their own benefit. Which basically meant ultimately invading the industry, getting free money and destroying everything.
In the end the statistics probably know better than you or I TBH. It's not just the obviously unstable ones who are unsuited to the level-headed impartiality of good leadership and it'd be far too arrogant to pretend we can tell at a glance which otherwise normal women lack the mental fortitude not to crack under the pressure. For every superficially normal woman who might qualify for a leadership role there's almost certainly an equally qualified man within arms reach who is far more likely to deliver lasting positive results.
There are far fewer leadership positions than there are potentially good leaders and in the quest to not be a dick to the few good women, you'll instead end up being a dick to the even better male leaders that would need to have their potential suppressed to pander to those women. Not only that but by abetting them you also play a part in everyone under them having to suffer the fallout if inferior leadership fucks up things for everyone or any petty games of favourites that may develop.
There's plenty of good men out there in need of a chance, you should never need to gamble on the B-list candidates.