Bridges closed after 26 barges break loose in Ohio
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
You got unusually, weirdly vitriolic in the reply.
I'm not "paranoid" just based on a whim and out of the blue. It's based on case after case after case, of conspiracies being perpetrated upon us for well over 100 years, with the people in power lying to us about literally everything, often telling us to not believe our own eyes, subjecting us and our children to mountains of propaganda since we were born.
I view things from this mindset because it's the most consistent and correct interpretation. The people in power are liars. View them, what they believe, say, and do from that lens, and you'll almost never err. Do accidents happen? Yes. Are there lots of stupid people around? Yes. But keep in mind the people in power love to cloak their maliciousness in an air of incompetence, to shield themselves from criticism and reprisal. Lots of people still assume that what we're experiencing is due solely to incompetence and greed, but those explanations don't suffice. The only motive that makes sense is malice.
The people you're mad at couldn't be further removed from maritime transportation. Your typical tugboat worker in the US is second or third generation in their career and has a two digit IQ cuz most of them are from the likes of fucking Biloxi.
Yes I am, because you're questioning the patriotism of the most deep red stupid people you could imagine. I guarantee you, no inland barge accident has ever, or WILL EVER, have any connection to the international cabal you're eagerly hounding.
Foreign container ships losing power? Yeah, maybe.
Weirdly vitriolic and anti-White. Nice combination you have there. Bolixi, Mississippi is 70% White. Rednecks are White, and usually quite smart. The "dumb redneck" meme is propaganda.
Thanks for at least admitting to being weirdly vitriolic. It was uncalled for, and doesn't make me, or any other reasonable person reading this, attracted to your side of the argument. You also, again, tacitly attack White people in your statement, while also, weirdly, defending "patriotism". I've never, not once, connected the international cabal (or whatever else you want to call it) with White people, rednecks, or everyday folks. I will say, though, that there are useful idiots working under the cabal, motivated mostly by greed, and many others by incompetence (as such people are easily duped and controlled), but as I said, the only motive that makes sense (from the top) is malice.
Out of curiosity, have you visited conspiracy theory forums or read up on the topic much? It puts the modern world in a wildly different context, knowing how many actual conspiracies have taken place over just the last 100 years.
Another word for "you didn't, but I want to imagine you did".
And that is why it seems weird to you.
Tacit: "not spoken; implied by or inferred from actions or statements"
You were obviously being anti-White, but your statements weren't overtly anti-White, ergo, you were being "tacitly" anti-White. You do know that intelligent people can infer what you're saying by contextual clues, right? We don't have to be told "this because that" like an NPC. Intelligent people are good at pattern recognition and connecting dots, that liars and idiots would rather they not do.
Your vitriol is weird because it was completely unnecessary. I brought up salient points, and you come back as if I kicked your dog and killed your grandma. You don't win people over like that. Not the person you're talking to, nor the people listening into the conversation. You (weirdly) became offended by me merely questioning the official story and stats, because it was you that posted them. Why take it so personally, unless you have something vested in this conversation (which, by the way, is weird)?
How you've "debated", the words you've used, and the arguments you've used are all weird. It paints you as someone that believes everything official, which itself is a "tacit" admission that you're wholly unaware of the totality of how fucked up the world is and with all of the extremely numerous conspiracy theories which would make you question official sources. It paints you as someone that (weirdly) hates anyone that doesn't believe the official story (which I should point out, is a lot like Reddit tier useful idiots who hate on "conspiracy theorists", because we question their religious adherence to "authorities"). And now, you keep doubling down. You should have zero reason to be this vitriolic. If you were being helpful, and linking to sources which disproved my questioning, it shouldn't/wouldn't bother you this much. You could simply shrug it off and leave it well enough alone. Why would you care if someone internet random didn't believe you?
The behavior you're displaying is identical to what bots and shills use. You all become extremely abrasive to anyone that doesn't believe you 100%. You use arguments that don't make sense. You attack the person, not the argument. You overtly rely on appeals to popularity, emotion, and authority. You abundantly use logical fallacies. You pretend to know nothing about conspiracy theories (even the tons of confirmed ones). You all talk the same, believe the same, and use the same arguments. So, yes, you're being weird.
I should also point out, that in one of your previous comments (which only occurred to me after the fact) that you tacitly implied that everyone here should care about what others think, when most of us are here precisely because we disagree with the curated/censored narratives pushed on mainstream platforms, which increasingly make less and less sense. And yet, the people here are called "conspiracy theorists", "racists", "antisemites", and the like, because we reject the obvious lies and propaganda. For reference, this is what you said: