Another word for "you didn't, but I want to imagine you did".

Tacit: "not spoken; implied by or inferred from actions or statements"

You were obviously being anti-White, but your statements weren't overtly anti-White, ergo, you were being "tacitly" anti-White. You do know that intelligent people can infer what you're saying by contextual clues, right? We don't have to be told "this because that" like an NPC. Intelligent people are good at pattern recognition and connecting dots, that liars and idiots would rather they not do.

And that is why it seems weird to you.

Your vitriol is weird because it was completely unnecessary. I brought up salient points, and you come back as if I kicked your dog and killed your grandma. You don't win people over like that. Not the person you're talking to, nor the people listening into the conversation. You (weirdly) became offended by me merely questioning the official story and stats, because it was you that posted them. Why take it so personally, unless you have something vested in this conversation (which, by the way, is weird)?

How you've "debated", the words you've used, and the arguments you've used are all weird. It paints you as someone that believes everything official, which itself is a "tacit" admission that you're wholly unaware of the totality of how fucked up the world is and with all of the extremely numerous conspiracy theories which would make you question official sources. It paints you as someone that (weirdly) hates anyone that doesn't believe the official story (which I should point out, is a lot like Reddit tier useful idiots who hate on "conspiracy theorists", because we question their religious adherence to "authorities"). And now, you keep doubling down. You should have zero reason to be this vitriolic. If you were being helpful, and linking to sources which disproved my questioning, it shouldn't/wouldn't bother you this much. You could simply shrug it off and leave it well enough alone. Why would you care if someone internet random didn't believe you?

The behavior you're displaying is identical to what bots and shills use. You all become extremely abrasive to anyone that doesn't believe you 100%. You use arguments that don't make sense. You attack the person, not the argument. You overtly rely on appeals to popularity, emotion, and authority. You abundantly use logical fallacies. You pretend to know nothing about conspiracy theories (even the tons of confirmed ones). You all talk the same, believe the same, and use the same arguments. So, yes, you're being weird.

I should also point out, that in one of your previous comments (which only occurred to me after the fact) that you tacitly implied that everyone here should care about what others think, when most of us are here precisely because we disagree with the curated/censored narratives pushed on mainstream platforms, which increasingly make less and less sense. And yet, the people here are called "conspiracy theorists", "racists", "antisemites", and the like, because we reject the obvious lies and propaganda. For reference, this is what you said:

But stop making this community look like a bunch of paranoid fucking idiots with the attention span of a twitch streamer.