No, not the disease itself. Despite media's renewed attempts to scaremonger about it, just don't go to any piss orgies and don't have sex with black crackwhores and you're fine.
Plenty of us remember how it went the last time. A new infectious disease starts spreading almost solely among homosexual men, media try to whip up a new frenzy like with the coof, people notice it's a gay disease that spreads exactly like GRIDS, then a couple of small children adopted by gays get infected, then a dog, and then the whole thing disappears from media like someone flipped a switch.
That was two years ago, which might as well been in the Pleistocene as far as the normie is concerned, and it's an election year in the US, so it's time for round two. Mpox cases are far outpacing last year's numbers, CDC reports.
Here's the thing, though - It wasn't just a couple children infected, as people tend to remember based on news report from the last time, it was dozens:
During May 17–December 31, 2022, 125 probable or confirmed U.S. monkeypox (mpox)† cases were reported among patients aged <18 years, including 45 (36%) in children aged ≤12 years. Eighty-three cases in persons aged <18 years diagnosed during May 17–September 24, 2022 were previously described (1); 28 (34%) of these were in children aged ≤12 years, 29% of whom did not have reported information on exposure. Among 20 (71%) of 28 patients with documented information on exposure, most were exposed by a household contact.
During September 25–December 31, 2022, 17 children aged ≤12 years with probable or confirmed mpox were identified through national surveillance. CDC provided a questionnaire to state and local health departments for collection of the child’s history of exposure to any person with mpox§ during the previous 3 weeks, exposure settings, types of contact (e.g., skin-to-skin, being held or cuddled, diaper change, or toilet use), and precautions taken by the person with mpox (e.g., practiced isolation or covered lesions). This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.¶
Three of the 17 pediatric patients were aged ≤7 days and had likely perinatal exposures; all three neonates were non-Hispanic Black or African American (Black). Two of these three mpox cases in neonates were previously reported (2). Ten of the remaining children were aged 0–4 years, and four children were aged 5–12 years. Nine patients were boys, and five were girls; nine were Black, two were Hispanic or Latino, and three were non-Hispanic White. Seven of the children aged 0–4 years, and two of those aged 5–12 years had known exposure to a person with mpox (Table); in five cases, the exposure source was unknown. Six of the seven children aged 0–4 years and both children aged 5–12 years known to be exposed to mpox were exposed by a caregiver or a household contact. Five of nine children with known exposure to a person with mpox were reported to have had close physical contact; notably, four of five children aged 0–4 years had skin-to-skin contact. Five of the nine children were exposed to a person with mpox who reported taking at least one precaution, including four persons who reported isolating. Two of these household contacts reported sharing a bed, bedroom, or bathroom with the child.
During the study period, 1.3% (1,118/84,614) of confirmed mpox cases globally were in patients <18 years of age. Most (61.8%, 691) were from the WHO Region of the Americas, followed by the African Region (30.3%, 339), the European Region (7.5%, 84), the Eastern Mediterranean Region, (<1%, 3), and the Western Pacific Region (<1%, 1) (Figure 1). No cases in patients <18 years of age were reported from the South-East Asia Region.
Data on self-reported sexual behavior were limited for mpox case-patients <18 years of age. However, 37/166 (22.3%) of case-patients 13–17 years of age self-identified as men who have sex with men (MSM) (Table 1). Eleven cases involved persons living with HIV, 1 of whom was immunosuppressed. Another 6 case-patients reported immunosuppression, as defined by their care providers, that was caused by undisclosed medical conditions. Overall, 67/293 (22.9%) of cases with information provided had a stated epidemiologic link to a known mpox case.
The CDC and the NIH obviously can't be expected to do any kind of analysis that might potentially produce politically incorrect results, so there's nothing in there about homosexuality at all, but that's not surprising. I just thought I'd add some horrifying details about the whole thing since I saw it mentioned last night in a comment, and I saw these citations on Kiwifarms earlier.
No, it's transmitted through skin contact with an infected area. So maybe some of the people didn't fuck their kids, they just rubbed them with their sores.
Actually makes me wanna gag. I don't know any parent who would willingly risk their kid catch their disease. How exactly does the disease work with sores etc? On hands or more on the netherregions?
You can get the sores pretty much anywhere, depending on where you made physical contact with an infected person. Most of the time, since this is a gay disease spread through orgies, it's around the asshole or on the face. There was a picture floating around, back during the original panic, of some faggot who got it real bad on his face. He was smirking in the photo as half his fucking face was rotting off. He looked so pleased with himself, like he finally caught them all.
But you can get it on your hands by touching someone else, too. Or your feet, or wherever else. It just gets on your skin and starts festering.
Okay, hands makes it easier to explain and not lose all hope in humanity. Otherwise we would have to assume almost all kids got fucked or something which I would rather avoid thinking about without getting angry. Thanks for the explanation.
Catching it any other way is as likely as catching herpes from a toilet seat. Every one of these cases should have been investigated and ended with a hanging.
Nothing is transmitted exclusively through sex. Sex just has a lot of blood and internal body contact, especially if done anally which very easily results in anal microfissures, tiny scratches which allow blood interaction.
Maybe they were sharing needles with the children? A bad blood transfusion in a hospital?
A dog, if it had an open sore in its mouth and bit a pocked individual and got infected blood into the open sore, could have a transmission that way. That is often how vampire bats wind up being such strong disease vectors, lots of blood contact. So "only through", no. But the same can be said of syphilis, herpes, and gonorrhea.