to be fair, a lot of normies are still programmed to instantly dismiss anything if it criticizes someone who is Jewish. if you want normie acceptance, it is better to focus on the individuals, organizations, and what they are doing.
Take the Soros conspiracy for instance. George Soros is a rich asshole who spends his money installing activist judges and funding riots. there's plenty reason to hate him. but the moment the Soros conspiracy gained traction, it was instantly put down by a single narrative: George Soros is jewish, therefore the Soros conspiracy is antisemitic. This worked.
the individual is an asshole because they are an asshole. their assholery may be influenced by their Creed or religion, but at the end of the day it is their choice to be an asshole. if you want support, focus less on their faith and more on them as individuals.
Optics fags are usually retarded, but they are right about one thing. We do need to actually sell our ideas to people, instead of just screaming in our bubble.
Part of that is knowing when to push or downplay things to better market it to the audience we wish to court. Normally, this will mean not being a sperg and screaming about Jews and Niggers directly and outright when making a point because, as you said, it makes everyone tune out immediately.
Example:
Someone call you a racist and you go on an apology spree over it? You're an idiot and your career will be destroyed. Why? Because apologizing (especially for something politically related) is a sign of weakness in today's world, you won't gain anything by apologizing and will instead give the SJWs the ammo needed to confirm your destruction in the eyes of normies. The correct response is to tell them to fuck off.
Another example:
You discover that a very wealthy Jewish individual is running a corporation that is actively trying to control several aspects of society and more or less create a new slave caste. How do you bring this to the public?
If your answer is to immediately state that they are Jewish your answer is likely bad optics. Normies are extremely protective of Jewish people, if you point out that he is Jewish you will be dismissed as a schizoid moron and thus your efforts will be in vain.
So whats the correct way to bring this information to the public, and perhaps hint at his ethnicity without overtly stating it? Focus on the wealth and the highly likely chance that the individual comes from a very wealthy family, and give the individuals full name. If they had a prior name, give that too. Then just provide the evidence of wrongdoing
Mentioning the name will often provide some clues as to background, and providing context for their wealth (especially cliffnotes history of that wealth) hints this as well.
to be fair, a lot of normies are still programmed to instantly dismiss anything if it criticizes someone who is Jewish. if you want normie acceptance, it is better to focus on the individuals, organizations, and what they are doing.
Take the Soros conspiracy for instance. George Soros is a rich asshole who spends his money installing activist judges and funding riots. there's plenty reason to hate him. but the moment the Soros conspiracy gained traction, it was instantly put down by a single narrative: George Soros is jewish, therefore the Soros conspiracy is antisemitic. This worked.
the individual is an asshole because they are an asshole. their assholery may be influenced by their Creed or religion, but at the end of the day it is their choice to be an asshole. if you want support, focus less on their faith and more on them as individuals.
Optics fags are usually retarded, but they are right about one thing. We do need to actually sell our ideas to people, instead of just screaming in our bubble.
Part of that is knowing when to push or downplay things to better market it to the audience we wish to court. Normally, this will mean not being a sperg and screaming about Jews and Niggers directly and outright when making a point because, as you said, it makes everyone tune out immediately.
Optics matter.
Example: Someone call you a racist and you go on an apology spree over it? You're an idiot and your career will be destroyed. Why? Because apologizing (especially for something politically related) is a sign of weakness in today's world, you won't gain anything by apologizing and will instead give the SJWs the ammo needed to confirm your destruction in the eyes of normies. The correct response is to tell them to fuck off.
Another example:
You discover that a very wealthy Jewish individual is running a corporation that is actively trying to control several aspects of society and more or less create a new slave caste. How do you bring this to the public?
If your answer is to immediately state that they are Jewish your answer is likely bad optics. Normies are extremely protective of Jewish people, if you point out that he is Jewish you will be dismissed as a schizoid moron and thus your efforts will be in vain.
So whats the correct way to bring this information to the public, and perhaps hint at his ethnicity without overtly stating it? Focus on the wealth and the highly likely chance that the individual comes from a very wealthy family, and give the individuals full name. If they had a prior name, give that too. Then just provide the evidence of wrongdoing
Mentioning the name will often provide some clues as to background, and providing context for their wealth (especially cliffnotes history of that wealth) hints this as well.