Twitch could simply ban the bad actors who have made it their life’s work to create loopholes on the platform in order to sell their porn to children, but there’s too much money in letting these whores run rampant. So the “solution” is a purposely ineffective game of cat and mouse, a game in which twitch makes millions while distributing porn to their young audience.
I do wonder, however, if the thots aren’t secretly propping up the whole platform.
Twitch could simply ban the bad actors who have made it their life’s work to create loopholes on the platform
I still don't understand this idea so many people have of "I'm not touching you" being a legitimate defense against reprisal.
If you are pushing for loopholes or against the edge of the rules, you are clearly trying to break them sneakily and should be dealt with accordingly as if you had done so. Its a retarded defense when your little brother did it, and it still is now.
Its one thing to abuse loopholes to point them out to get them closed, but this isn't the case. Its just them abusing loopholes to continue to act in defiance of the clear idea the rules are trying to prevent.
Then close those loopholes and stop allowing him and anyone to do so.
One of the problems with not enforcing your rules evenly and consistently within their spirit (not pure letter) is that they cease to be rules and are just suggestions. Once its reached suggestions, you can't hold someone accountable for the violation of anything other than not being a super nice person.
If he was the first to ever do so (and you followed through at the time), or attempts to try tricksy shit after they close them, then hold him responsible for it. Otherwise its on you for failing to properly enforce for this entire time. That's why Copyright Law is built the way it is, after a while you lose because you didn't care enough to protect it.
The idea or rules and laws for most people is don’t do this. They don’t really consider the “why” the rule is in place. To be more considered with the spirit of the law means you assume responsibility to not be a jackass. If you instead have a child’s understanding of rules, you can push that responsibility on daddy, the government, the admins, ect.
Twitch could simply ban the bad actors who have made it their life’s work to create loopholes on the platform in order to sell their porn to children, but there’s too much money in letting these whores run rampant. So the “solution” is a purposely ineffective game of cat and mouse, a game in which twitch makes millions while distributing porn to their young audience.
I do wonder, however, if the thots aren’t secretly propping up the whole platform.
I still don't understand this idea so many people have of "I'm not touching you" being a legitimate defense against reprisal.
If you are pushing for loopholes or against the edge of the rules, you are clearly trying to break them sneakily and should be dealt with accordingly as if you had done so. Its a retarded defense when your little brother did it, and it still is now.
Its one thing to abuse loopholes to point them out to get them closed, but this isn't the case. Its just them abusing loopholes to continue to act in defiance of the clear idea the rules are trying to prevent.
I mean.. trump uses loop holes for taxes..
Then close those loopholes and stop allowing him and anyone to do so.
One of the problems with not enforcing your rules evenly and consistently within their spirit (not pure letter) is that they cease to be rules and are just suggestions. Once its reached suggestions, you can't hold someone accountable for the violation of anything other than not being a super nice person.
If he was the first to ever do so (and you followed through at the time), or attempts to try tricksy shit after they close them, then hold him responsible for it. Otherwise its on you for failing to properly enforce for this entire time. That's why Copyright Law is built the way it is, after a while you lose because you didn't care enough to protect it.
The idea or rules and laws for most people is don’t do this. They don’t really consider the “why” the rule is in place. To be more considered with the spirit of the law means you assume responsibility to not be a jackass. If you instead have a child’s understanding of rules, you can push that responsibility on daddy, the government, the admins, ect.