Twitch could simply ban the bad actors who have made it their life’s work to create loopholes on the platform
I still don't understand this idea so many people have of "I'm not touching you" being a legitimate defense against reprisal.
If you are pushing for loopholes or against the edge of the rules, you are clearly trying to break them sneakily and should be dealt with accordingly as if you had done so. Its a retarded defense when your little brother did it, and it still is now.
Its one thing to abuse loopholes to point them out to get them closed, but this isn't the case. Its just them abusing loopholes to continue to act in defiance of the clear idea the rules are trying to prevent.
To specifically address the Twitch aspect of this, Twitch doesn’t want the loopholes closed because the admins/Amazon gets off on selective enforcement of the rules anyway.
They still have a bunch of artists banned and yet softcore porn streamers barely ever get banned for more than a week, and it’s because the admins are getting ‘benefits’ from these girls. The girl in question actually got a call from one of the admins while streaming and went to go change to a different bikini, which is laughable in and of itself.
If the people who ran Twitch weren’t basically using it as a brothel, a lot of what happens on Twitch wouldn’t be happening.
Then close those loopholes and stop allowing him and anyone to do so.
One of the problems with not enforcing your rules evenly and consistently within their spirit (not pure letter) is that they cease to be rules and are just suggestions. Once its reached suggestions, you can't hold someone accountable for the violation of anything other than not being a super nice person.
If he was the first to ever do so (and you followed through at the time), or attempts to try tricksy shit after they close them, then hold him responsible for it. Otherwise its on you for failing to properly enforce for this entire time. That's why Copyright Law is built the way it is, after a while you lose because you didn't care enough to protect it.
The idea or rules and laws for most people is don’t do this. They don’t really consider the “why” the rule is in place. To be more considered with the spirit of the law means you assume responsibility to not be a jackass. If you instead have a child’s understanding of rules, you can push that responsibility on daddy, the government, the admins, ect.
I still don't understand this idea so many people have of "I'm not touching you" being a legitimate defense against reprisal.
If you are pushing for loopholes or against the edge of the rules, you are clearly trying to break them sneakily and should be dealt with accordingly as if you had done so. Its a retarded defense when your little brother did it, and it still is now.
Its one thing to abuse loopholes to point them out to get them closed, but this isn't the case. Its just them abusing loopholes to continue to act in defiance of the clear idea the rules are trying to prevent.
To specifically address the Twitch aspect of this, Twitch doesn’t want the loopholes closed because the admins/Amazon gets off on selective enforcement of the rules anyway.
They still have a bunch of artists banned and yet softcore porn streamers barely ever get banned for more than a week, and it’s because the admins are getting ‘benefits’ from these girls. The girl in question actually got a call from one of the admins while streaming and went to go change to a different bikini, which is laughable in and of itself.
If the people who ran Twitch weren’t basically using it as a brothel, a lot of what happens on Twitch wouldn’t be happening.
I mean.. trump uses loop holes for taxes..
Then close those loopholes and stop allowing him and anyone to do so.
One of the problems with not enforcing your rules evenly and consistently within their spirit (not pure letter) is that they cease to be rules and are just suggestions. Once its reached suggestions, you can't hold someone accountable for the violation of anything other than not being a super nice person.
If he was the first to ever do so (and you followed through at the time), or attempts to try tricksy shit after they close them, then hold him responsible for it. Otherwise its on you for failing to properly enforce for this entire time. That's why Copyright Law is built the way it is, after a while you lose because you didn't care enough to protect it.
The idea or rules and laws for most people is don’t do this. They don’t really consider the “why” the rule is in place. To be more considered with the spirit of the law means you assume responsibility to not be a jackass. If you instead have a child’s understanding of rules, you can push that responsibility on daddy, the government, the admins, ect.
By "loop holes" you mean "plays by the rules as they are defined in a way that reduces his tax liability as much as possible."
Same as every other intelligent person who does everything they can to pay as little tax as possible.