In Griffin’s case, the New Mexico Supreme Court rejected his appeal because he missed filing deadlines after the district court judge ruled against him.
Griffin’s challengers said that made him ineligible to seek review from the nation’s high court.
So, they rejected certiorari on a case that was already closed due to a procedural error on the part of the appellant? It doesn't really make the same statement the article leads you to believe.
Nonetheless, restricting the ruling on Trump to candidates for federal office was incredibly short-sighted and stupid. They basically opened the door for states and counties to outlaw candidates based on party affiliation.
If you don't think within a couple years we will see a case of a Democrat-control political subdivision declaring the Republican party at large to be a terrorist organization or some other nonsense and remove all of their candidates off the ballot you haven't been paying attention to how the left operates.
To be entirely fair, they kind of had to limit it to federal office as that was what was at issue in the case. SCOTUS has, generally, always handed down narrow rulings. However, its often (D)ifferent when it's a cause certain judges like.
i'd say they should beat them to the punch but this is the republican party we're talking about, they're only allowed to bow their heads and act the part of the good little cuck.
So, they rejected certiorari on a case that was already closed due to a procedural error on the part of the appellant? It doesn't really make the same statement the article leads you to believe.
Nonetheless, restricting the ruling on Trump to candidates for federal office was incredibly short-sighted and stupid. They basically opened the door for states and counties to outlaw candidates based on party affiliation.
If you don't think within a couple years we will see a case of a Democrat-control political subdivision declaring the Republican party at large to be a terrorist organization or some other nonsense and remove all of their candidates off the ballot you haven't been paying attention to how the left operates.
To be entirely fair, they kind of had to limit it to federal office as that was what was at issue in the case. SCOTUS has, generally, always handed down narrow rulings. However, its often (D)ifferent when it's a cause certain judges like.
i'd say they should beat them to the punch but this is the republican party we're talking about, they're only allowed to bow their heads and act the part of the good little cuck.
I can see Washington State declaring anyone not a Democrat as a terrorist. It's already sort of happening.