- KotakuInAction2

()

posted 2 years ago by m0r1arty 2 years ago by m0r1arty +73 / -0

41 comments

41 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (41)

sorted by:

▲ 65 ▼

– OBRIENMUSTSUFFER 65 points 2 years ago +65 / -0

Sweet Baby Inc. Doesn’t Exist

Sweet Baby Inc. Exists but gamers are wrong about it

Sweet Baby Inc. Does Exactly what Gamers think it does but that’s a good thing

What comes next?

permalink save report block reply

▲ 37 ▼

– realerfunction 37 points 2 years ago +37 / -0

"gamers against sweet baby are the problem and must be purged"

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 21 ▼

– AgilePickle1123 21 points 2 years ago +21 / -0

“Toxic gamers continue to harass beloved Sweet Baby Inc.”

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 20 ▼

– JustHereForTheSalmon 20 points 2 years ago +20 / -0

That didn't happen.

And if it did, it wasn't that bad.

And if it was, that's not a big deal.

And if it is, that's not my fault.

And if it was, I didn't mean it.

And if I did, you deserved it.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 20 ▼

– deleted 20 points 2 years ago +20 / -0

▲ 16 ▼

– AgilePickle1123 16 points 2 years ago +16 / -0

Why not supporting Sweet Baby Inc. makes you a racist sexist

permalink parent save report block reply