It's true, some WNs are Christian, but any group that tolerates paganism is not headed in a good direction. The general problem is that they think ethnocentrism is both sufficient and necessary to move the country in a good direction. I think it's necessary, but not sufficient by itself. I actually think letting Catholics immigrate en masse to a Protestant nation was a mistake, even though I'm partly descended from them.
The conclusion that the US should be mostly one race is exactly what I've come to. Once I read Jared Taylor's work, everything became clear, and he describes himself as a race realist.
Sounds like you are a WN then but you don't like the label of WN so you try to distance yourself from that even though that's what you are. At the end of the day if you want your nation to be mostly White people only, you're a WN. Kind of like how if you're White, you're White, even though White people consist of Catholics, Pagans, Protestants, Atheists, etc... but just because you dislike Pagans doesn't mean you aren't White if you are indeed White. It sounds to me like you are a WN even if you don't agree with some of the other people who call themselves WN.
You are 100% right though that being all White is necessary but insufficient. A big problem I have with many WNs is that too many of them think all-White is the only necessary thing to fix the country.
I think religion in the end matters a lot less than race. The White Catholics were less of a problem than the jews or Africans.
Sounds like you are a WN then but you don't like the label of WN so you try to distance yourself from that even though that's what you are. At the end of the day if you want your nation to be mostly White people only, you're a WN.
If that's all there was to it then yes, but that's not how the term is understood by the vast majority of people, and not just CNN viewers but people firmly on the right wing as well. There's a reason why the word "wignat" is used by people on the right, even groypers.
You are 100% right though that being all White is necessary but insufficient. A big problem I have with many WNs is that too many of them think all-White is the only necessary thing to fix the country.
I think religion in the end matters a lot less than race. The White Catholics were less of a problem than the jews or Africans.
I would say religion is slightly more important than race, because of the long-term effects. Christianity brought Europeans up from barbarians into world powers.
White Catholics worked, contributed, etc, but the Catholic attitude towards charity and third worlders helped usher in the welfare state and mass immigration. Phillip Hart, the other half of Hart-Cellar, was Catholic. Most invaders from South America are Catholic and the Vatican definitely takes that into consideration. The climate change world domination plan of the current pope is characteristic of the institution, not just himself.
Paulie from the Sopranos defined "Elvis country" as "any place there are no Jews or Italians" - aka a nightmare for him. Sure, it's a TV show, but that was a real attitude and it speaks to a mindset in those ethnic groups towards founding Americans.
If you scroll down you can see the breakdown between White, Hispanic and Black Catholics and Protestants regarding whether they want more border security or path to citizenship for immigrants.
The White Catholics and Protestants are very similar in their beliefs. It's the Hispanic Catholics that have a significant difference in belief wanting path to citizenship over better border security.
These stats would support my view more than yours that race is far more important than religion.
I don't doubt that the USA would be better if it was just the founding protestants but that's because they were White. If all we took in were White Catholics, I don't think that would have had such a detrimental impact on society. The real overall negative impact was jews and Africans and now Hispanics. They are ultimately what is killing the country. The non-Whites.
I'm not going to argue the point that race is much more influential at the present moment, because it is, but a 2010 poll is not descriptive at all of the long history of Catholics in America. Catholics have complained about discrimination for decades, and Catholic pluralism laid the groundwork for Hart-Cellar. Hart-Cellar, in turn, laid the groundwork for the destruction of the ethnocentric character of America.
Religion is the ideological unification of the country. When religious practice is hollowed out, there is a vacuum in the national character that makes it vulnerable. In this case, consumerism and globalism filled the void, and here we are. You're talking about the short term, I'm talking about the long term.
It's true, some WNs are Christian, but any group that tolerates paganism is not headed in a good direction. The general problem is that they think ethnocentrism is both sufficient and necessary to move the country in a good direction. I think it's necessary, but not sufficient by itself. I actually think letting Catholics immigrate en masse to a Protestant nation was a mistake, even though I'm partly descended from them.
The conclusion that the US should be mostly one race is exactly what I've come to. Once I read Jared Taylor's work, everything became clear, and he describes himself as a race realist.
Sounds like you are a WN then but you don't like the label of WN so you try to distance yourself from that even though that's what you are. At the end of the day if you want your nation to be mostly White people only, you're a WN. Kind of like how if you're White, you're White, even though White people consist of Catholics, Pagans, Protestants, Atheists, etc... but just because you dislike Pagans doesn't mean you aren't White if you are indeed White. It sounds to me like you are a WN even if you don't agree with some of the other people who call themselves WN.
You are 100% right though that being all White is necessary but insufficient. A big problem I have with many WNs is that too many of them think all-White is the only necessary thing to fix the country.
I think religion in the end matters a lot less than race. The White Catholics were less of a problem than the jews or Africans.
If that's all there was to it then yes, but that's not how the term is understood by the vast majority of people, and not just CNN viewers but people firmly on the right wing as well. There's a reason why the word "wignat" is used by people on the right, even groypers.
I would say religion is slightly more important than race, because of the long-term effects. Christianity brought Europeans up from barbarians into world powers.
White Catholics worked, contributed, etc, but the Catholic attitude towards charity and third worlders helped usher in the welfare state and mass immigration. Phillip Hart, the other half of Hart-Cellar, was Catholic. Most invaders from South America are Catholic and the Vatican definitely takes that into consideration. The climate change world domination plan of the current pope is characteristic of the institution, not just himself.
Paulie from the Sopranos defined "Elvis country" as "any place there are no Jews or Italians" - aka a nightmare for him. Sure, it's a TV show, but that was a real attitude and it speaks to a mindset in those ethnic groups towards founding Americans.
Here's an example of some stats in 2010.
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2010/09/17/few-say-religion-shapes-immigration-environment-views/
If you scroll down you can see the breakdown between White, Hispanic and Black Catholics and Protestants regarding whether they want more border security or path to citizenship for immigrants.
The White Catholics and Protestants are very similar in their beliefs. It's the Hispanic Catholics that have a significant difference in belief wanting path to citizenship over better border security.
These stats would support my view more than yours that race is far more important than religion.
I don't doubt that the USA would be better if it was just the founding protestants but that's because they were White. If all we took in were White Catholics, I don't think that would have had such a detrimental impact on society. The real overall negative impact was jews and Africans and now Hispanics. They are ultimately what is killing the country. The non-Whites.
I'm not going to argue the point that race is much more influential at the present moment, because it is, but a 2010 poll is not descriptive at all of the long history of Catholics in America. Catholics have complained about discrimination for decades, and Catholic pluralism laid the groundwork for Hart-Cellar. Hart-Cellar, in turn, laid the groundwork for the destruction of the ethnocentric character of America.
Religion is the ideological unification of the country. When religious practice is hollowed out, there is a vacuum in the national character that makes it vulnerable. In this case, consumerism and globalism filled the void, and here we are. You're talking about the short term, I'm talking about the long term.