Killing invaders to repel them from your lands has a long historical precedent. The response wasn't necessarily wrong, just ineffective at such a small scale.
It wasn't for that, if I remember right from the livestream to his manifesto he was an accelerationist who wanted to start a race war and get the US involved too.
So less border security, more blackpill start WW3 mentality.
Killing invaders to repel them from your lands has a long historical precedent. The response wasn't necessarily wrong, just ineffective at such a small scale.
It wasn't for that, if I remember right from the livestream to his manifesto he was an accelerationist who wanted to start a race war and get the US involved too.
So less border security, more blackpill start WW3 mentality.
Sure, his motivation was that, but my point stands that, historically, killing invaders isn't an incorrect response to being invaded.
he was an invader as well, from australia.