It's funny because literally no one would know you had herpes if you didn't sleep around. You'd be less likely to catch it in the first place, in fact, it'd probably go damn near extinct if the social contract was put into its rightful place.
Now no one wants your ugly, smelly, diseased vagina. Deal with. If I had cysts and warts on my dick no one would want to come near me - the stigma exists for a good reason.
"STDs wouldn't exist if we had the social contract of yore" is provably false and a retard level take.
Sexual Disease was so rampant in the 1500-1700s that wigs and makeup to cover syphilis scars were accepted into mainstream culture which persists to this day.
Many of the "puritans" and protestants of the new world were just as guilty. Blackbeard attacked Charleston not for money, but for medicine...to treat syphilis. The fact that they knew a supply would be there tells you a lot for the demand at the time.
All the founding fathers of the US wore wigs. Franklin, arguably Quaker, was most notorious for his debauchery. Jefferson fathered children out of wedlock.
This mythical moral standards did not and has never existed.
Many of you seem to think I'm advocating all our hedonism, which is the exact opposite of what I'm saying. What I am saying is: moral standards are not enough to keep this in cheque and legal safeguards need to be in place for any hope.
All the founding fathers of the US wore wigs. Franklin, arguably Quaker, was most notorious for his debauchery. Jefferson fathered children out of wedlock.
This mythical moral standards did not and has never existed.
You just corroborated his point. Regals had the opportunity to engage in more debauchery than commoners -- the rules for thee, not for me dictum. Most commoners could not afford to engage in such trifles due to the difficulty in surviving at the time -- the social contracts held well for the commoners, opposite of how it is today where everyone is actively being encouraged from the top-down -- the zeitgeist -- to abandon shame, embrace pride, and act degenerate.
It's funny because literally no one would know you had herpes if you didn't sleep around. You'd be less likely to catch it in the first place, in fact, it'd probably go damn near extinct if the social contract was put into its rightful place.
Now no one wants your ugly, smelly, diseased vagina. Deal with. If I had cysts and warts on my dick no one would want to come near me - the stigma exists for a good reason.
"STDs wouldn't exist if we had the social contract of yore" is provably false and a retard level take.
Sexual Disease was so rampant in the 1500-1700s that wigs and makeup to cover syphilis scars were accepted into mainstream culture which persists to this day.
"The social contract" was always a lie.
Those were the aristocracy. French royal courts etc, which were famous for their degeneracy.
The Puritan movement and, later, Victorian sensibilities were a response to that degenerate bullshit.
I remind you that the British Empire reached its height in the Victorian age.
Want to point to the orgies of the late Roman empire and declare that everyone, everywhere has orgies?
Not at all.
Many of the "puritans" and protestants of the new world were just as guilty. Blackbeard attacked Charleston not for money, but for medicine...to treat syphilis. The fact that they knew a supply would be there tells you a lot for the demand at the time.
All the founding fathers of the US wore wigs. Franklin, arguably Quaker, was most notorious for his debauchery. Jefferson fathered children out of wedlock.
This mythical moral standards did not and has never existed.
Many of you seem to think I'm advocating all our hedonism, which is the exact opposite of what I'm saying. What I am saying is: moral standards are not enough to keep this in cheque and legal safeguards need to be in place for any hope.
You just corroborated his point. Regals had the opportunity to engage in more debauchery than commoners -- the rules for thee, not for me dictum. Most commoners could not afford to engage in such trifles due to the difficulty in surviving at the time -- the social contracts held well for the commoners, opposite of how it is today where everyone is actively being encouraged from the top-down -- the zeitgeist -- to abandon shame, embrace pride, and act degenerate.